Skip to main content
. 2010 Aug 4;99(3):887–896. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2010.04.076

Table 1.

Folding and unfolding kinetics of the selected AKBSUB mutants

Protein ΔGUnfold(H2O) (kJ/mol) kF(H2O) (s−1) kU(H2O) (s−1) βT
AKBSUB 14 ± 1 0.030 ± 0.002 8.01 × 10−5 ± 0.5 × 10−5 0.45
AKBSUB Q199R 16 ± 1 0.015 ± 0.003 1.50 × 10−5 ± 0.2 × 10−5 0.25
AKBSUB Q199R/G213E 21 ± 1 0.13 ± 0.01 1.70 × 10−5 ± 0.2 × 10−5 0.53
AKBSUB Q199R/T179I 24 ± 1 0.80 ± 0.04 2.0 × 10−5 ± 0.3 × 10−5 0.58
AKBSUB Q199R/G214R 25 ± 1 0.20 ± 0.02 3.0 × 10−6 ± 0.1 × 10−6 0.48
AKBSUB Q199R/A193V 26 ± 1 12.2 ± 0.2 1.5 × 10−4 ± 0.3 × 10−4 0.78
AKBSUB Q199R/Q16L 28 ± 1 0.70 ± 0.04 4.40 × 10−6 ± 0.7 × 10−6 0.57

ΔGUnfold (H2O) values are based on the equilibrium data (Fig. 2a), and kF(H2O) and kU(H2O) values are folding and unfolding rate constants extrapolated to 0 M GuHCl (Fig. 2b). βT (a measure of nativeness/compaction in the transition state for folding) was calculated as mf/(meq) where meq = mf + mu such that mf is the slope of the folding arm and mu is the slope of the unfolding arm in the Chevron plot (Fig. 2b).

Taken from Couñago et al. (20).