Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Aug 2.
Published in final edited form as: Behav Genet. 2009 Feb 27;39(4):371–379. doi: 10.1007/s10519-009-9258-z

Table 3.

Liability threshold model fitting analyses

Model χ2 df P AIC RMSEA χ2dif dfdif Pdif
Understanding number Full 3.03 8 .93 −12.97 .000
Threshold 12.97 9 .16 −5.02 .004 9.94 1 < .05
Common variance 3.03 9 .96 −14.97 .000 .00 1 > .05
Scalar 4.45 12 .97 −19.55 .000 1.42 4 > .05
Non-numerical processes Full 2.50 8 .96 −13.50 .000
Threshold 17.92 9 .04 −.09 .012 15.42 1 < .05
Common Variance 2.50 9 .98 −15.50 .000 .00 1 > .05
Scalar 3.55 12 .99 −20.45 .000 1.05 4 > .05
Computation and knowledge Full 5.62 8 .69 −10.38 .000
Threshold 20.25 9 .02 2.25 .018 14.63 1 < .05
Common variance 5.62 9 .78 −12.38 .000 .00 1 > .05
Scalar 8.74 12 .73 −15.26 .003 3.12 4 > .05
Composite Full 6.02 8 .65 −9.98 .000
Threshold 37.09 9 .00 19.09 .033 31.07 1 < .05
Common variance 6.02 9 .74 −11.98 .000 .00 1 > .05
Scalar 8.35 12 .74 −15.48 .000 2.33 4 > .05