Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Educ Psychol. 2010 May 1;102(2):327–340. doi: 10.1037/a0018448

Table 7.

Coefficients and Classification Indices for the Extension Models using Paragraph Reading Measures

Measure B SE Wald p TN FN TP FP HR Sensitivity Specificity AUC SE z
Model 7: Base Model (n = 320) 235 5 45 35 87.2 90.0 87.0 0.950 0.012
 WIF Screen −0.120 0.038 9.809 0.002
 RDN −0.243 0.100 5.852 0.016
 Sound Matching −0.380 0.122 9.672 0.002
 Oral Vocabulary −0.047 0.018 6.985 0.009
 Constant 9.013 1.903 22.439 0.000
Model 8: Extension using RR (n = 320) 235 5 45 35 87.2 90.0 87.0 0.950 0.012 0.00
 WIF Screen −0.122 0.042 8.375 0.005
 RDN −0.244 0.101 5.852 0.016
 Sound Matching −0.381 0.123 9.610 0.003
 Oral Vocabulary −0.047 0.018 6.959 0.009
 RR 0.008 0.089 0.008 0.928
 Constant 9.025 1.908 22.382 0.000
Model 9: Extension using ORF (n= 320) 237 5 45 33 87.9 90.0 87.8 0.951 0.011 0.22
 WIF Screen −0.031 0.050 0.393 0.531
 RDN −0.193 0.103 3.486 0.062
 Sound Matching −0.332 0.123 7.279 0.008
 Oral Vocabulary −0.048 0.019 6.355 0.012
 ORF −0.048 0.019 6.325 0.013
 Constant 8.697 1.979 19.307 0.000

Note. Hit rate, sensitivity, and specificity are expressed as percentages. WIF Screen = Word Identification Fluency screening measure; RDN = Rapid Digit Naming; RR = Running Record; ORF = Oral Reading Fluency; TN = true negatives; FN = false negatives; TP = true positives; FP = false positives; HR= Hit rate (TP + TN)/N; sensitivity = TP/(TP + FN); specificity = TN/(TN + FP); ROC = receiver operating characteristic; AUC = area under the curve. z = test for difference in AUC compared to Model 7: Extension Base Model. Models 8 and 9 were compared to Model 7.