Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Rheumatol. 2010 Apr 15;37(6):1244–1251. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.090989

Table 5.

Odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals among persons with ROA at baseline for risk factors associated with Minimally Clinically Important Improvement (MCII) in WOMAC* physical function mutually adjusted for other factors, with higher OR representing greater likelihood of MCII.

Mean (sd) n MCII Definitions
MCII 26% MCII 17%§ MCII Tertile**
Knee strength [Newton-Meters]
 Low 27.1 (9.7) 316 1.0 (reference) 1.0 (reference) 1.0 (reference)
 Medium 54.75 (8.1) 313 1.5 [1.0,2.2] 1.4 [1.0,2.0] 1.6 [1.0,2.6]
 High 104.0 (28.3) 315 1.9 [1.1,3.0] 1.7 [1.1,2.7] 2.2 [1.2,4.0]
Number of subjects included in logistic models 935 935 935
Hosmer and Lemeshow Test (p-value) 8 degrees of freedom 0.18 0.31 0.37
*

WOMAC = Western Ontario McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index

Mutually adjusted for age, gender, education, comorbidities, body mass index, knee pain, depressive symptoms, physical activity, ROA in one or both knees, and medication usage at baseline.

26% decrease in WOMAC physical function to reach meaningful clinically important improvement

§

17% decrease in WOMAC physical function to reach meaningful clinically important improvement

**

3.6, 8.0, and 13.9 out of 68 for those in low, medium, and high baseline WOMAC physical function tertiles, respectively