Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Aug 2.
Published in final edited form as: J Chromatogr. 1981 Oct 9;225(2):347–357. doi: 10.1016/s0378-4347(00)80283-2

TABLE II.

EFFECTS OF PARGYLINE OR RO 4-4602 ON THE CONCENTRATIONS OF DA, DOPAC, HVA, 5-HTP, 5-HT AND 5-HIAA IN THE STRIATUM, OLFACTORY TUBERCLE AND NUCLEUS ACCUMBENS

Treatment Protein (ng/mg)
DA DOPAC HVA 5-HTP 5-HT 5-HIAA

Striatum
Saline 90.3 ± 6.7 17.2 ±1.2 9.3 ±0.9 4.6 ±0.5 6.4 ± 0.6
Pargyline 112.0 ±6.5* 0.58 ±0.12* 1.4 ± 0.08* 8.3 ± 0.8* 4.1 ± 0.4*
RO 4-4602 57.4 ± 5.3* 16.1 ± 4.9 8.2 ±0.4 6.0 ± 0.5 2.8 ± 0.4* 6.3 ± 0.7
Olfactory tubercle
Saline 41.3 ±4.0 7.8 ±1.0 3.1 ±0.8 10.1 ± 1.1 5.3 ± 0.8
Pargyline 55.9 ± 6.8* 0.39 ±0.01* 0.26 ± 0.04* 15.7 ± 0.5* 1.4 ± 0.2*
RO 4-4602 29.5 ± 3.9* 5.8 ± 0.8 2.2 ±0.1 9.9 ± 1.0 6.3 ± 0.9* 4.2 ± 0.3
Nucleus accumbens
Saline 59.3 ± 5.0 15.4 ± 1.0 5.7 ±0.6 5.9 ± 0.9 5.5 ± 0.6
Pargyline 96.4 ± 2.5* 1.1 ± 0.2* 1.5 ± 0.09* 9.0 ± 0.9* 2.4 ± 0.2*
RO 4-4602 64.6 ± 7.2 13.8 ± 1.2 5.0 ±0.8 10.0 ± 1.6 5.9 ± 0.6 4.9 ± 1.2

Animals were sacrificed 45 min after saline (1 ml/kg), pargyline (75 mg/kg) or RO 4-4602 (750 mg/kg). Brain regions were dissected and the samples assayed as described in Methods. Values represent means ± S.E.M. for 3 or 4 determinations.

*

Indicates values different from saline-injected controls at p < 0.05.