Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Aug 2.
Published in final edited form as: Obesity (Silver Spring). 2009 Oct 8;18(4):690–695. doi: 10.1038/oby.2009.316

Table 2.

CT derived abdominal adipose tissue.

IAAT (cm2) DSAT (cm2) SSAT (cm2)
Aerobic
Adherers
N=15		 Baseline
Follow-up
Change		 48.0±17.7
48.8±20.1
0.8 cm2 1.6 %		 65.7±29.4 a
101.0±46.4
35.3 cm2 53.7 %		 129.4±64.5
142.1±32.9
22.7 cm2 17.5 %
Aerobic
Non-adherers
N=13		 Baseline
Follow-up
Change		 46.9±19.5 a
72.4±26.8
25.5 cm2 54.4 %		 84.7±27.4 a
140.4±51.4
55.7 cm2 a 65.8 %		 142.5±46.0
188.4±71.1
45.9 cm2 32.2 %
Resistance
Adherers
N=18		 Baseline
Follow-up
Change		 43.7±14.4
43.3±15.5
− 0.4 cm2 0.0%		 82.3±35.0
89.4±35.0
7.1 cm2 8.6 %		 132.0±41.7
146.1±47.1
14.1 cm2 9.9 %
Resistance
Non-adherers
N=11		 Baseline
Follow-up
Change		 47.4±27.6
57.8±28.0
10.4 cm2 21.9 %		 74.5±30.2
100.3±39.0
25.8 cm2 34.6 %		 127.0±42.5
150.8±41.2
23.8 cm2 18.7 %
No Exercise
N=26		 Baseline
Follow-up
Change		 50.0±20.8 a
62.4±28.2
12.4 cm2 24.8 %		 79.4±34.4 a
114.2±51.5
34.8 cm2 43.8 %		 127.8±43.6 a
158.9±47.7
31.1 cm2 24.3 %
P T < 0.01
G = 0.23
TxG <0.01		 T < 0.01
G = 0.14
TxG < 0.02		 T = 0.12
G = 0.27
TxG = 0.23
a

Significant difference between baseline and follow-up