Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Aug 2.
Published in final edited form as: Hum Ecol Risk Assess. 2009 May 1;15(3):565–578. doi: 10.1080/10807030902892554

Table 4.

Comparison of the urinary levels (ng/ml) of phthalate metabolites in the NJ study population to US general and female population (NHANES 2001–2002 data)

Metabolites Subjects GM 50th 75th 90th 95th
MMP NJ women * <LODa <LODa 1.47 2.48
US total 1.15 1.50 3.30 6.00 9.80
US female 1.13 1.30 3.30 6.40 10.3
MEP NJ women 135 169 400 721 749
US total 178 169 465 1230 2500
US female 174 167 427 1050 1840
MBP NJ women 15.7 14.8 29.6 48.1 68.9
US total 18.9 20.4 40.4 73.6 108
US female 20.2 21.6 46.7 85.0 120
MiBP NJ women 4.05 4.60 7.48 12.6 13.5
US total 2.71 2.60 5.70 11.9 17.9
US female 2.68 2.50 5.70 12.6 18.7
MBzP NJ women 10.0 9.15 21.4 44.3 52.8
US total 15.1 15.7 38.0 80.8 122
US female 14.6 15.4 38.1 81.4 122
MCPP NJ women 1.63 1.55 3.20 4.17 7.09
US total 2.75 3.00 5.70 10.0 14.6
US female 2.62 3.00 5.60 10.0 14.7
MEHP NJ women 109 115 155 227 246
US total 4.27 4.10 9.80 22.8 38.9
US female 4.23 4.10 9.70 23.0 42.5
MEHHP NJ women 112 109 203 245 309
US total 20.0 20.1 43.6 91.3 192
US female 18.3 18.2 39.8 86.0 170
MEOHP NJ women 93.4 95.1 166 213 233
US total 13.5 14.0 29.6 59.9 120
US female 12.5 13.0 28.1 57.5 115
*

Geometric mean not calculated because detection of frequency < 60%.