Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Magn Magn Mater. 2010 Oct 1;322(20):3122–3126. doi: 10.1016/j.jmmm.2010.05.044

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

(a) Normalized transverse decay rate T˜21 vs. number N of nanoparticles in an aggregate. Each point is a simulation of a randomly assembled aggregate conformation. The line is a power law fit with an exponent of α = 0.444 ± 0.002. Spread about the fit is due to the dependence of T˜21 on the geometry of the aggregate. Error bars denote statistical error in each simulation. (b) Scaling exponent α vs. the ratio τDCP of the diffusion time τD to pulse-echo time τCP calculated by comparing aggregates with N = 1 and N = 25 at different values of τCP. The horizontal grey line denotes the average α = 0.444 ± 0.006 for τDCP < 10−3. The data point indicated as an ‘x’ represents the value of the fit in Fig. 3(a). The decrease in α as τDCP increases is due to the aggregate transitioning from the motional (MA) regime to the echo limited (EL) regime.