Table 3.
Individual subject rankings based on AHI during 50% WB.
| Subject | AHIMS | Digital Photo | Rank Difference | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AHI Value | Rank | AHI Value | Rank | ||
| D | 0.309 | 1 | 0.353 | 1 | 0 |
| J | 0.309 | 2 | 0.363 | 4 | -2 |
| P | 0.310 | 3 | 0.380 | 5 | -2 |
| O | 0.318 | 4 | 0.320 | 2 | 2 |
| S | 0.322 | 5 | 0.401 | 3 | 2 |
| L | 0.328 | 6 | 0.359 | 7 | -1 |
| B | 0.330 | 7 | 0.384 | 8 | -1 |
| H | 0.337 | 8 | 0.335 | 6 | 2 |
| A | 0.339 | 9 | 0.379 | 11 | -2 |
| C | 0.340 | 10 | 0.333 | 15 | -5 |
| F | 0.344 | 11 | 0.397 | 10 | 1 |
| N | 0.347 | 12 | 0.349 | 9 | 3 |
| I | 0.354 | 13 | 0.389 | 14 | -1 |
| R | 0.361 | 14 | 0.356 | 12 | 2 |
| E | 0.365 | 15 | 0.323 | 20 | -5 |
| T | 0.371 | 16 | 0.335 | 16 | 0 |
| K | 0.372 | 17 | 0.378 | 19 | -2 |
| Q | 0.378 | 18 | 0.372 | 13 | 5 |
| G | 0.379 | 19 | 0.330 | 17 | 2 |
| M | 0.382 | 20 | 0.383 | 18 | 2 |
Subjects are listed sequentially from lowest to highest values of AHI as measured using the AHIMS. The numerical rank of each subjects' AHI is also listed for the digital photographic method alongside the AHIMS rank. The rank difference was calculated the digital photographic rank subtracted from the AHIMS rank.