Skip to main content
. 2010 Jul 14;30(28):9477–9487. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0333-10.2010

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Group differences in regional connectivity metrics and global integration. A, Group mean connectivity strength for each of the 72 regions, ordered by mean regional strength in healthy volunteers; error bars indicate SEM. B, Regional diversity of correlations, ordered by mean diversity in healthy volunteers; error bars indicate SEM. C, Cortical surface renderings of strength. D, Cortical surface renderings of diversity. Regions showing a significant group difference in the metric when corrected for multiple comparisons using false-positive correction (p < 0.014) are indicated. E, Graph to show link between group differences in strength and diversity for individual regions. Lines connect equivalent anatomical regions in healthy volunteers (black) and people with schizophrenia (red). F, Principal components analysis: scree plot of the proportion of variance explained by successive principal components in people with schizophrenia (red) and healthy volunteers (black). Inset shows the group difference in the proportion of variance explained by the first principal component. Error bars indicate SD. For details, see Table 3 and supplemental Tables 6 and 7 (available at www.jneurosci.org as supplemental material).