Skip to main content

View full-text article in PMC

. 2010 May 7;18(8):1007–1021. doi: 10.1007/s00520-010-0873-2

Table 9.

Summary of studies on dental restorations (3)

Author	Cancer Dx	Cancer Tx	Study type	Time of assessment	Final N/intervention 1	Final N/intervention 2	Final N/intervention 3
Hu et al. 2002 [54]	Malignant tumors (assumed H&N^a)	Cervicofacial RT^b	Cohort	Post-RT^b	N = 73 restorations	N = 73 restorations
				Assessment at placement 6, 12, and 24 months	15 patients	15 patients
				Assessment at placement 6, 12, and 24 months	Ketac molar restorations	Fuji IX GP restorations

McComb et al. 2002 [52]	Not specified (assumed H&N^a)	H&N^a RT^b	Cohort/N-RCS	Post-RT^b	N = 39 patients/44 class V restorations (initial)	N = 39 patients/44 class V restorations	N = 39 patients/44 class V restorations
McComb et al. 2002 [52]	Not specified (assumed H&N^a)	H&N^a RT^b	Split mouth design	Recall at 6,12, 18, and 24 months	Conventional glass ionomer (GI) restorations	Resin-modified glass ionomer restorations (RMGI)	Composite restorations

Wood et al. 1993 [53]	H&N^a	RT^b	Before and after	Post-RT^b	N = 54 (36 patients/self control)	N = 54 (36 patients/self control)
Wood et al. 1993 [53]	H&N^a	RT^b	Split mouth design	Placement before RT then 6 month assessment	Glass ionomer cement restorations	Amalgam restorations

^aHead and neck

^bRadiation

^cRandomized control trial

^dChemotherapy