Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2010 Aug;19(8):848–857. doi: 10.1002/pds.1867

Table 4.

1:1 propensity score matched analysis of outcomes presented in Table 3. Matching was performed with the greedy matching algorithm

Outcome Within-center analyses
Pooled
British Columbia* Pennsylvania New Jersey Horizon
Myocardial infarction hospitalization
Cumulative risk analysis (odds ratios)
 Matched by universal PS 1.26 [0.97, 1.62] 1.06 [0.68, 1.64] 1.30 [0.81, 2.08] 0.97 [0.52, 1.78] 1.19 [0.98, 1.44]
  Per cent of exposed patients matched 98.4% 91.7% 94.3% 95.0% 95.4%
 Matched by hd-PS 1.19 [0.92, 1.54] 1.31 [0.81, 2.11] 1.34 [0.81, 2.20] 1.05 [0.50, 2.17] 1.21 [1.00, 1.48]
  Per cent of exposed patients matched 95.6% 74.6% 79.1% 84.8% 85.2%
Time-to event analysis (hazard ratios)
 Matched by universal PS 1.24 [0.91, 1.69] 1.59 [0.78, 3.25] 1.64 [0.80, 3.36] 0.81 [0.37, 1.76] 1.26 [0.98, 1.62]
  Per cent of exposed patients matched 98.4% 91.7% 94.3% 95.0% 95.4%
 Matched by hd-PS 1.22 [0.89, 1.68] 3.30 [1.25, 8.70] 0.91 [0.45, 1.83] 0.52 [0.21, 1.27] 1.17 [0.90, 1.52]
  Per cent of exposed patients matched 95.8% 73.5% 77.5% 86.4% 85.0%
Hospitalization for revascularization
Cumulative risk analysis (odds ratios)
 Matched by universal PS 1.52 [1.11, 2.06] 1.00 [0.75, 1.34] 0.97 [0.75, 1.27] 1.26 [0.94, 1.68] 1.15 [1.00, 1.33]
  Per cent of exposed patients matched 98.4% 91.7% 94.3% 95.0% 95.4%
 Matched by hd-PS 1.06 [0.81, 1.40] 1.00 [0.72, 1.37] 0.91 [0.67, 1.22] 1.46 [1.07, 2.00] 1.08 [0.93, 1.26]
  Per cent of exposed patients matched 96.3% 74.4% 78.2% 84.9% 85.3%
Time-to event analysis (hazard ratios)
 Matched by universal PS 1.47 [1.00, 2.15] 0.85 [0.56, 1.29] 0.80 [0.55, 1.16] 1.26 [0.89, 1.77] 1.07 [0.89, 1.29]
  Per cent of exposed patients matched 98.4% 91.7% 94.3% 95.0% 95.4%
 Matched by hd-PS 1.48 [1.00, 2.19] 0.88 [0.57, 1.38] 0.73 [0.49, 1.10] 1.58 [1.09, 2.30] 1.14 [0.94, 1.39]
  Per cent of exposed patients matched 96.1% 76.0% 78.2% 84.9% 85.6%

PS Propensity score; hd-PS High-dimensional propensity score.

*

Within-center odds ratios are estimated by logistic regression.

Pooled odds ratios are estimated by conditional logisitic regression stratified by center.