Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2009 Dec 11;51(7):827–837. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2009.02201.x

Table 2.

Activations by event-related linear contrasts in the MID task*

Talairach Coordinates: |t-value|: uncorrected p
Reward vs nonincentive anticipation
Controls
 L Nucleus accumbens −9 11 −4 4.906 <.0001
 R Nucleus accumbens 10 11 −5 3.914 <.001
 L Putamen −17 3 −4 5.242 <.0001
 L thalamus −5 −22 5 6.659 <.00001
 R thalamus −3 −19 4 5.689 <.00001
 L substantia nigra −9 −11 −7 6.675 <.00001
 L orbitofrontal cortex −19 31 −16 4.890 <.0001
AED
 L Nucleus accumbens −8 11 1 5.690 <.00001
 R Nucleus accumbens 14 10 −6 4.640 <.00001
 L dorsolateral thalamus −10 −10 17 4.904 <.0001
 L thalamus −8 −14 5 4.821 <.0001
 Mesial frontal cortex 2 46 −8 6.291 <.00001
 Posterior cingulate gyrus 3 −54 18 6.287 <.0001
 L orbitofrontal cortex −33 40 −3 5.544 <.0001
Loss-avoidance vs nonincentive anticipation
No significant activations in either subject group
Reward vs nonreward feedback
Controls
 R Nucleus accumbens 9 8 −6 6.412 <.00001
 L Nucleus accumbens −9 11 −6 5.311 <.0001
 L Putamen −23 3 4 5.398 <.0001
 R Putamen 25 7 9 5.171 <.0001
 Mesial orbitofrontal cortex −4 45 −9 5.622 <.0001
 R orbitofrontal cortex 29 39 −9 5.400 <.0001
AED
R Nucleus accumbens 11 13 −1 7.218 <.000001
L Nucleus accumbens −10 13 −1 9.126 <.0000001
L Putamen −21 3 6 5.339 <.0001
R Putamen 20 −1 −6 5.109 <.0001
Mesial frontal cortex 3 46 −1 6.791 <.000001
Mesial frontal cortex 3 35 4 7.570 <.000001
Loss vs nonloss feedback
Controls
 R Insula 36 13 −4 5.819 <.00001
AED
 R Insula 39 12 −6 4.678 <.001
*

Activation maxima listed here are significant at q < .05 per False Discovery Rate