Skip to main content
. 2010 Jun 25;10:373. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-10-373

Table 5.

Interventions for improving uptake of CRC screening in disadvantaged and minority groups

Approach Study Type Screening type Population group targeted Observed changes in screening uptake or intent to screen for CRC
1. Organizational/system changes


Patient navigators to overcome patient reported barriers from screening to treatment [123]
RCT Any CRC screening Low income and non-English speaking Uptake of CRC screening post-intervention was 27% vs 12% (p‹ 0.001) before intervention.
Culturally sensitive patient navigators and physician recommendation [124]
RCT

Endoscopy and FOBT

Low income, Hispanic patients attending primary care practice


Completion of endoscopy 6 months post intervention was 15.8% in intervention group vs 5% in control (physician recommendation only) (p= 0.019)
Completion of FOBT 3 months post intervention was 42.1% in intervention group vs 25% in control group (p = 0.086)
Patient navigator combined with reminder letter [125] Intervention
Any CRC screening
English speaking, Immigrants from Brazil, Portugal & Haiti
31% of intervention group vs 9% control patients completed screening after 6 months

2. Targeting of healthcare users

Culturally appropriate intervention using health educator and bilingual educational material [126] RCT

FOBT

Chinese Americans

Uptake of FOBT after 6 months was 69.5% intervention group vs 27% control group

Personalized and tailored interventions [127,128]
Four groups;
1-Tailored intervention
2-Standard intervention
3-Tailored intervention plus phone reminder
4-Control
RCT [128]





Any CRC screening




Mixture of African American (58%) and white



Screening assessed 2 years post intervention:
Screening completion among those in the intervention groups ranged from 44-48% vs 33% control group (p‹0.05) [128]



Storytelling to promote CRC screening [110,129]
RCT

Endoscopy

Low SES Latino

Intent to obtain CRC screening via endoscopy increased in those exposed to storytelling compared to those exposed to risk tool based information (p = 0.038)

Community based awareness and educational interventions [130]

Participatory using intervention material developed through participatory approach Any CRC screening

Rural white



Intention to screen increased significantly in those exposed to educational materials and who had not been tested in the last 5 yrs compared to those that had (p = 0.025).

Community-based participatory [131]
Using culturally relevant approach and education held on a ‘family day'. Followed by intensive follow-up and encouragement of participants by letters and phone calls
Participatory



Any CRC screening



Rural Native Hawaiian in Hawaii



Increase in compliance with CRC screening in both men and women.
CRC screening 6 months post intervention increased in men from 39% to 75% (p = 0.002) and in women 36% to 76% (p = 0.002)
Limitations- small sample size (28 men and 25 women)

Culturally appropriate education to enhance knowledge and screening [132]
Assigned to one of three groups:
1. Cultural & self-empowerment group
2. Traditional group
3. Modified cultural group
4. Control
Experimental/repeated measures



FOBT




African-American Elders





Knowledge assessed at 6 and 12 months. FOBT screening assessed at 12 months and found greater participation in those in Cultural & Self Empowerment group.



Intensive one-on-one patient education [133] RCT
FOBT
Ethnically diverse group
Proportion of patients returning FOBT was significantly higher in intensive education group compared with those receiving standard education (65.6% vs 51.3% p‹0.01)

Telephone support intervention [134]

RCT

Any CRC screening
Minority, low income women
Proportion of women completing CRC screening increased from 39% to 54% in the intervention group and 39% to 50% in the control group (p = 0.13)
Tailored telephone outreach [135]
RCT
Any CRC screening Minority

CRC screening compliance 6 months post intervention was 27% in intervention group vs 6.1% in control group (mailed print material)

Education with Elderly Educators [136]
Four educational methods:
1. Elderly Educators
2. Elderly Educators plus Adaption for Aging Changes method
3. Adaption for Aging Changes method
4. Traditional method
2-by-2 factorial design





FOBT





Socioeconomically disadvantaged African Americans and White





Participation in FOBT was 93% in those receiving combination of Elderly Educators plus Adaption for Aging Changes method, 63% in those exposed to Elderly Educators only and 43% participation in those receiving Adaptation for Aging changes method only and 56% exposed to traditional method.


Video-based education [137]
RCT
FOBT
Majority had less than high school education 69.6% of intervention group returned FOBT vs 54.4% in control group (p = 0.035)