Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Control Release. 2010 Mar 25;145(1):26–32. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2010.03.013

Table 1.

Statistics for the log P – log R data set for each skin model.

Skin
Type		 Linear Regression Parameters
 log Ca,c
Slope a,b Intercept a r2
hFTS −1.08 ± 0.10 −2.99 ± 0.09 0.93 −3.05 ± 0.14
h700 −1.04 ± 0.23 −2.88 ± 0.20 0.66 −2.91 ± 0.36
h250 −1.09 ± 0.27 −2.63 ± 0.20 0.68 −2.69 ± 0.31
pFTS −1.07 ± 0.08 −2.90 ± 0.07 0.94 −2.95 ± 0.16
p700 −1.07 ± 0.23 −2.85 ± 0.16 0.74 −2.89 ± 0.27
a

Range corresponds to the 95% confidence interval.

b

Slopes are not significantly different from −1.

c

The average intercept value, log C, was obtained by extrapolating each data point to the y-axis using a slope of −1 (see Section 2.6). Log C is equivalent to the regressed intercept when the regressed slope is exactly −1.