Skip to main content
. 2010 Aug 5;6(8):e1001000. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1001000

Table 2. Potential effects of the different mechanisms of insecticide resistance (IR) on vector longevity, competence and behaviour, and expected effects on the parasite's R 0.

Pleiotropic Effects of Insecticide Resistance Mechanisms Concerned Traits Affected Effect on R 0
Vector longevity
IR trades off with resources needed to insure longevity EST, GST, MOX Decreased longevity (1/g) Negative
IR increases oxidative stress MOX, EST Decreased longevity (1/g) Negative
IR protects against oxidative stress GST Increased longevity (1/g) Positive
Vector competence
IR renders the vector toxic for the parasite EST, MOX Decreased probability of infection (c), decreased parasite growth and development (b) Negative
IR blocks the immune response GST Increased probability of infection (c), increased parasite growth and development (b) Positive
IR stimulates the immune response EST Decreased probability of infection (c), decreased parasite growth and development (b) Negative
IR trades off with resources needed to insure immunity EST, GST, MOX Increased probability of infection (c), increased parasite growth and development (b) Positive
IR trades off with resources needed for parasite development EST, GST, MOX Decreased parasite growth and development (b), increased parasite incubation time (n) Negative
Vector behaviour
IR alters the functioning of the nervous system AChE, GABA, SCH Hyperactive or sluggish vector: decreased or increased biting rate of the focal host (a) Positive/Negative
IR trades off with resources needed for vector mobility EST, GST, MOX Sluggish vector: decreased biting rate of the focal host (a) Negative
IR switches feeding preferences away from blood EST, GST, MOX Decreased biting rate of the focal host (a) Negative

See Table 1 for acronyms.