Skip to main content
. 2010 Jul 21;10:68. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-10-68

Table 7.

Longitudinal measurement invariance across gender at cycles 1, 4 and 7 Pooled sample (n = 6336a)

Level of invariance X2
df
p value
CFI TLI RMSEA Δχ2
dfe
p value
Measurement invariance
 L1. Configural 240.3
97
< .0001
0.982 0.993 0.022 N/A
 L2. Metric (vs. L1) 263.8
98
< .0001
0.98 0.991 0.023 71.0
21
<.0001
 L3. Metric - Partialb (vs. L1) 224.4
100
< .0001
0.985 0.994 0.02 25.5
19
0.1462
 L4. Scalar - Partialc (vs. L3) 309.9
118
< .0001
0.976 0.992 0.023 145.8
40
<.0001
 L5. Scalar - Partiald (vs. L3) 233.6
110
< .0001
0.985 0.994 0.019 45.2
27
0.0154
 L6. Scale factor - Partialc (vs. L5) 234.1
114
< .0001
0.985 0.995 0.018 48.0
32
0.0342
Structural invariance
 L7. Longitudinal stability (vs. L6) 111.6
60
< .0001
0.994 0.996 0.016 5.8
5
0.3299
 L8. Latent variance (vs. L7) 97.5
54
< .0001
0.995 0.996 0.016 4.4
4
0.3522
 L9. Latent means (vs. L8) 198.3
53
< .0001
0.982 0.986 0.029 114.7
6
<.0001
 L10. Latent means - Longitudinal (vs. L8) 105.4
55
< .0001
0.994 0.995 0.017 15.0
6
0.0199

a Number of respondents with complete data for cycles 1, 4 and 7.

b The constraint of equal factor loadings was relaxed at cycle 1 for item C (restless or fidgety) and over time in men for items B (nervous), C (restless or fidgety) and F (everything was an effort) and for women for items B and F.

c Complete invariance of the scale factors could not be investigated since some items had to be unconstrained in the preceding models.

d The constraint of equal items thresholds was relaxed for items A (so sad nothing could cheer you up), B and D (hopeless) at cycle 4 and for items C (restless or fidgety), D and F at cycle 7. In men, item A was freed whereas, in women, the constraint of equal item thresholds was relaxed for all items except E.

e The degrees of freedom for the chi-square tests are adjusted for the WLSMV estimator and do not correspond to difference of degrees of freedom between the more constrained and the less constrained model.