Skip to main content
. 2010 Jul 20;9:209. doi: 10.1186/1475-2875-9-209

Table 2.

Predictors of malaria rapid diagnostic test (RDT) sensitivity (RDT positive, expert microscopy positive) in Blantyre, Malawi, 2009

Sensitivity
n/N(%)
Unadjusted odds ratio
(P value)
Adjusted odd ratio Model 1
(P value)
Adjusted odds ratio Model 2
(P value)
RDT type
 Bioline SD 188/193 (97) 2.6 (0.17) 2.9 (0.14)
 First response malaria 185/201 (92) 1.1 (0.82) 1.1 (0.84)
 Paracheck 118/130 (91) 0.8 (0.63) 0.8 (0.77)
 ICT diagnostics 98/109 (90) Referent Referent
Age
 5 to ≤ 15 yrs 369/382 (97) 4.8 (< 0.001) 5.1 (< 0.001) 5.1 (< 0.001)
 > 15 yrs 206/237 (87) Referent Referent Referent
Temperature
 ≥ 37.5°C 281/298 (94) 2.1 (0.09) 1.7 (0.23) 1.7 (0.22)
 < 37.5°C 286/310 (92) Referent Referent Referent
Geometric mean parasite density
 ≥ 5000 per μl 181/193 (94) 1.1 (0.74) 0.7 (0.36) 0.6 (0.32)
 < 5000 per μl 408/440 (93) Referent Referent Referent
Self-treated with antimalarial in past 2 weeks
 Yes 44/51 (86) 0.9 (0.85) 1.2 (0.82) 2.1 (0.38)
 No 501/538 (93) Referent Referent Referent
RDT performed by:
 Community health worker 481/507 (95) 2.6 (0.03) 3.1 (0.02)
 Laboratory technician 108/126 (86) Referent Referent

Model 1 assesses RDT type adjusted for patient age, temperature, parasite density, and self-treatment with anti-malarials.

Model 2 assesses RDT test operator (community health worker versus laboratory technician) adjusted for patient age, temperature, parasite density, and self-treatment with anti-malarials.