Table 3.
Strategy 1 | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Predicted | ||||||
CL | FO | SF | FA | NA | ||
Actual | CL | 2813 | 10 | 0 | 12 | 511 |
FO | 92 | 125 | 1 | 30 | 30 | |
SF | 21 | 2 | 56 | 23 | 0 | |
FA | 30 | 5 | 13 | 336 | 4 | |
NA | 216 | 3 | 0 | 9 | 2264 | |
Strategy 2 | ||||||
Predicted | ||||||
CL | FO | SF | FA | NA | ||
Actual | CL | 3327 | 4 | 1 | 14 | - |
FO | 134 | 115 | 6 | 23 | - | |
SF | 21 | 1 | 56 | 24 | - | |
FA | 44 | 3 | 12 | 329 | - | |
- | - | - | - | - | - |
The confusion matrices used for classification of domain pairs according to their shared structural level following strategies 1 and 2. CL = shared Class, FO = shared Fold, SF = shared Super-family, FA = shared Family and NA = no shared structural level.