Abstract
Cytochromes of c-type contain covalently attached hemes that are formed via thioether bonds between the vinyls of heme b and cysteines of the C1XXC2H motifs of apocytochromes. In various organisms, this post-translational modification relies on membrane-associated specific biogenesis proteins, referred to as cytochrome c maturation systems. A highly complex version of these systems, Ccm or System I, is found in Gram-negative bacteria, archaea and plant mitochondria. Here, we describe emerging functional interactions between the Ccm components categorized into three conserved modules, and present a mechanistic view of the molecular basis of ubiquitous vinyl-2~Cys1 and vinyl-4~Cys2 heme b-apocytochrome c thioether bonds in c-type cytochromes.
Keywords: cytochrome c, heme, cytochrome c maturation or biogenesis, Ccm system, Gram-negative bacteria
Diversity of cytochrome c maturation processes
Cytochromes (cyts) c are hemoproteins with covalently attached iron-protoporphyrin IX (or heme b) groups (see Glossary). Primarily, they are electron carriers between enzymes involved in cellular energy transduction processes such as photosynthesis or respiration [1, 2]. They also act as enzymes for biosynthesis of cofactors (e.g. tryptophan tryptophylquinones) [3] and lipidic signaling molecules (e.g. long chain fatty acid-glycines) [4]. Moreover, cyts c bind gases such as carbon monoxide, nitric oxide or oxygen and play roles in the oxidation of hydroxylamines and thiosulfates, as well as in other cellular processes [5]. In some eukaryotes, they contribute to signaling events that lead to apoptosis (programmed cell death) [6].
Despite diverse functions, different three-dimensional structures, and heme b contents, all c-type cyts invariably contain at least one heme b cofactor that is attached to the polypeptide by one or two thioether bonds (Figure 1). These bonds are always formed between the vinyls at positions 2 and 4 of the tetrapyrrole ring of heme b and the thiols of the amino (N)- and carboxyl (C)-terminal cysteines (Cys1 and Cys2), respectively, of a heme binding motif (C1XXC2H) within apocyts c [7, 8]. The number of residues between the cysteines of this motif sometimes varies [9], but commonly, the histidine residue together with another amino acid (e.g. methionine or histidine) serve as axial ligands to hexa-coordinate the heme-iron atom (Figure 1). Remarkably, the orientation of the heme b group relative to the cyt c peptide (i.e. its stereo-specificity) is universally conserved [5].
Figure 1. Heme binding domain of a cyt c.

A three-dimensional structural close-up view of the covalent heme binding domain of R. capsulatus cyt c2 (PDB 1C2R) is shown with the peptide backbone (gray) surrounding the heme group (red) and its thioether linkages between the vinyl-2~Cys34 and vinyl-4~Cys37 (yellow). His38 (blue) of the heme binding motif (C1XXC2H) acts as the 5th axial ligand of heme iron.
In prokaryotic or archaeal cells and in eukaryotic organelles, the pathways leading to covalent ligation of heme b to an apocyt c are complex, but they share common characteristics [7, 10]. First, apocyts c are synthesized and translocated across a lipid bilayer into a cellular compartment where they mature and function. This compartment is always on the positive (or p) side of an energy-transducing membrane, and corresponds to the bacterial extracytoplasmic space, plastid thylakoid lumen, or mitochondrial inter membrane space. Second, biosynthesis and transport of heme b and translocation of apocyts c occur via distinct and independent mechanisms. Third, thioether bond formation needs the iron atom of heme b and the thiols of the apocyt c heme binding motif to be available in their reduced states [10, 11]. Fourth, heme b is always attached to apocyts c in a specific orientation via an unknown mechanism, and specialized proteins acting as chaperones and catalysts are always required for c-type cyt production. This process can be subdivided into three highly conserved modules [12]. Two of these modules prepare and deliver the substrates (i.e. heme and apoprotein) to a third module that catalyzes the heme b-apocyt c ligation per se, to yield active cyts c (Figure 2). Indeed, protein composition of the modules vary broadly among organisms [7, 13], but the modular organization of cyt c biogenesis appears omnipresent, possibly accommodating common biochemical requirements under varying cellular environments [14].
Figure 2. Modular organization of cyt c maturation system.

In general, cyt c maturation is carried out by three coordinately operating membrane integral modules: Module 1 (heme translocation and relay, right panel) deals with the transport of heme b across energy transducing membranes and its availability to Module 3 (apocyt c–heme b ligation, middle panel), to which the apocyt c is conveyed by Module 2 (apocyt c thioredox and chaperoning, left panel) upon its translocation. Module 1 and Module 2 produce ligation-competent heme b and apocyt c substrates, respectively, and Module 3 catalyzes the thioether bonds between the appropriate vinyl and cysteine groups of these substrates. The arrows indicate possible simultaneous or sequential paths followed by the substrates to yield active c-type cyts. In all organisms, regardless the type of the native maturation system used, some forms of these modules are always present, but the number of components in each module is variable.
This review deals exclusively with the cyt c maturation pathway found in α- and γ-proteobacteria, Deinococcus species, mitochondria of plants and red algae, and archaea called Ccm system (or System I) [7]. Recently, Kranz et al. have published a comprehensive review of cyt c biogenesis, with emphasis on topologies of Ccm components, heme trafficking and heme-iron redox processes [15]. Here, we categorize the various Ccm components into three common modules, and describe their emerging functional interactions with each other. We also present a mechanistic view for the occurrence of universally conserved stereo-specific vinyl-2~Cys1 and vinyl-4~Cys2 heme b-apocyt c ligations seen in cyts c, and underline outstanding questions critical for understanding this important biological process.
Other types of closely related cyt c biogenesis processes, such as those referred to as the Ccs system (or System II) seen in some Gram-positive bacteria, cyanobacteria, chloroplasts of plants and algae, and some β-, δ- and ε-proteobacteria [16, 17], or the CCHL system (or System III) confined to mitochondria of fungi, metazoans and some protozoa [14, 18] are not discussed here. Equally, the process of covalent heme attachment to cyt b subunit of the cyt b6f complexes (i.e. CCB components) in cyanobacteria and chloroplasts of photosynthetic eukaryotes [19], or additional systems proposed to occur in some Gram-positive bacteria [13, 20], or in mitochondria of Euglenozoa (e.g. Trypanosoma and Leishmania) [21] are not discussed here. Excellent reviews concerning these similar cyt c biogenesis processes are available [22, 23].
Modular organization of the Ccm system
The Ccm system consists of up to ten (CcmABCDEFGHI and CcdA or DsbD) membrane-bound components [10, 15] (Table 1). The three operational modules of this system accomplish (i) the transport and relay of heme b (Module 1), (ii) preparation and chaperoning of ligation-competent apocyts c (Module 2), and (iii) heme b–apocyt c ligation per se (Module 3) to form holocyts c (Figure 2). The three modules are described below with examples from mainly Gram-negative bacteria.
Table 1.
Ccm system components
| Component | Structural characteristics | Proposed function | Significant variation |
|---|---|---|---|
| CcmA | Peripheral membrane protein with a nucleotide-binding domain, conserved Walker A, B motifs, and ABC signature sequences |
Involved in ATP dependent release of holoCcmE from the CcmABCDE complex, and/or is a part of a putative transporter required for releasing heme b from holoCcmE |
Unknown |
| CcmB | Integral membrane protein with six transmembrane (TM) helices and conserved FXXDXXDGSL motif |
Involved in the release of holoCcmE from the CcmABCDE complex, and/or is a part of a putative transporter required for releasing heme b from holoCcmE |
Unknown |
| CcmC | Six TM helices with two conserved histidine and a tryptophan rich motif (WGX[F,Y,W]WXWDXRLT) |
Involved in translocation and ligation of heme b to CcmE and in possible release of holoCcmE from the CcmABCDE complex |
Unknown |
| CcmD | Small monotopic membrane protein without any conserved motif |
Enhances CcmE specific heme b lyase activity of CcmC, and possible release of holoCcmE from the CcmABCDE complex |
Not found in plant mitochondrial Ccm system |
| CcmE | Single TM helix, single histidine within a conserved HXXXY motif able to covalently bind heme b via its vinyl-2 group |
Heme chaperone of the Ccm system; contributes to stereospecific apocyt c - heme b ligation |
Histidine of HXXXY motif is substituted by cysteine in most archaeal and some bacterial species |
| CcmF | Eleven TM helices with tryptophan rich motif (WGGXWFWDPVEN), and four conserved histidines |
Binds holoCcmE and probably performs apocyt c-heme b ligation in the CcmHFI complex |
Multiple split homologs in Ccm system of plant mitochondria |
| CcmG | Single TM helix with a periplasmic thioredoxin (CXXC) motif |
Reduction and transfer of apocyt c to the heme b ligation site |
Not found in Ccm system of plant mitochondria; fused to CcdA in some archaeal species |
| CcmH | Single TM helix and a periplasmic thioredoxin-like (LRCXXC) motif |
Binds apocyt c and possibly contributes to stereo-specific apocyt c-heme b ligation in the CcmFHI complex |
Fused with the C-terminal domain of CcmI in some species like E. coli; not found in species that contains a CcmE with a modified heme b binding motif |
| CcmI | Two TM helices, a cytoplasmic leucine zipper-like motif, and three or four TPR motifs in its periplasmic C-terminal portion |
Possibly binds apocyt c as a part of the CcmFHI complex |
Not found in Ccm system of plant mitochondria |
| CcdA/DsbD | Six TM helices and two conserved cysteines; only the central domain of DsbD is homologous to CcdA |
Thioreduction of CcmG | Not found in Ccm system of plant mitochondria; CcdA and CcmG are fused together in some archaeal species |
Module 1: heme translocation and relay processes
Module 1 consists of five Ccm components (CcmABCDE), of which four (CcmABCD) are involved in conveying heme b to CcmE to yield a heme-loaded CcmE (holoCcmE) (Figure 3). CcmE is a monotopic membrane protein with a periplasmic heme binding domain, and functions as a transient heme chaperone to supply heme b for cyt c production [24]. Its periplasmic domain has a compact β-barrel core structure with a flexible C-terminal extension [25, 26]. A surface exposed histidine residue (His130 in Esherichia coli CcmE) is located in this region within a conserved HXXXY motif [27]. This residue is covalently linked to vinyl-2 of heme b, which apparently is oxidized (Figure 4) [15]. Mutational analyses indicated that this histidine residue is critical for the function of CcmE [28, 29], although it is not conserved and in most archaeal as well as some bacterial species it is substituted with a cysteine [30]. Remarkably, species harboring a histidine to cysteine variant of CcmE lack the CcmH component of Module 3 (described below). CcmC is a member of the putative heme handling protein (HHP) family [31] with six transmembrane helices, a tryptophan-rich (WWD) motif and two conserved periplasmic histidine residues that are essential for loading heme to CcmE to yield holoCcmE [32]. CcmD is a poorly conserved, small (about 60 amino acids long) monotopic membrane protein that enhances the activity of CcmC [33], and is implicated in the release of holoCcmE from a putative CcmABCD complex [34]. CcmA is a peripheral membrane protein with a nucleotide-binding domain, conserved Walker A and B motifs, and ABC (ATP-binding cassette) transporter signature sequences [35]. In plant mitochondria, the homologue of CcmA was found in a high molecular weight membrane protein complex of unknown composition [37]. CcmB is an integral membrane protein with six transmembrane helices, and together with CcmC, is required for membrane localization of CcmA. Membrane topologies of CcmABCD components are described in detail in Kranz et al. [15]. Immunobiochemical data indicate that CcmA, CcmB, CcmC and CcmD interact with each other [36], suggesting that these components form an ABC-type transporter complex under some conditions.
Figure 3. Module 1 components of Ccm system.
Specific protein components of Module 1 (heme translocation and relay) drawn as a large complex formed of the ATP hydrolyzing CcmA subunits and their membrane integral partners CcmB, CcmC and CcmD loading heme b to the heme chaperone CcmE are shown. The conserved WWD motif of CcmC, found in heme handling proteins, is indicated. On the left, HoloCcmE is shown after its dissociation from CcmABCD following heme b loading and ATP hydrolysis. The CcmABCDE-independent heme b transport pathway of unknown nature is depicted with a dotted arrow and “?”.
Figure 4. Structure of holoCcmE and its bound heme b.

The three-dimensional structure of CcmE (PDB 1J6Q) is shown in gray, with a heme molecule (in red) modeled as linked covalently via its vinyl-2 to His130 (blue) of CcmE. This model was generated by docking the structure of cyt c2 with its heme (PDB 1C2R) to that of CcmE without heme, followed by minimizing the obtained binary structure and rendering invisible the cyt c2 backbone. Note that the structure of holoCcmE is unknown. This hypothetical structure is simply to illustrate the covalent ligation between heme vinyl-2~His130 and axial heme iron coordination via Tyr134, leaving heme vinyl-4 exposed and available for subsequent ligation to apocyt Cys2.
How heme b is translocated across membranes, how it is loaded onto CcmE, and what is the role of CcmABCD in this step remains unclear. Mutants lacking the entire set of Ccm components can produce periplasmic b-type cyts that have non-covalently bound heme b [38], indicating that Ccm-independent heme b transport across the cytoplasmic membrane also occurs. Thus, if CcmABCD are involved in heme b translocation, as initially proposed [36], then they must be specific to the c-type cyts only. In the absence of CcmA and CcmB, CcmC can load heme b to CcmE, but transfer of heme b from holoCcmE to apocyt c is blocked, suggesting that CcmC is a CcmE-specific heme lyase [32, 35]. Moreover, recent work indicates that ATP hydrolysis by CcmA is required for the release of holoCcmE from a CcmABCD-containing complex to enable holoCcmE to supply heme b for cyts c production [34]. However, whether this ATP hydrolysis could also be associated with an ABC-type transporter activity of CcmAB for an unknown compound required for cyt c maturation [35] remains undetermined.
Module 2: apocyt c thioredox and chaperoning processes
Upon Sec-dependent protein translocation of apocyts c across the membrane, the cysteines of the heme binding motifs are thought to be oxidized by the extracytoplasmic DsbA-DsbB oxidative protein-folding pathway to form intramolecular disulfide bonds [10, 15], possibly to render the apocyts c less degradation-prone (Figure 5) [39]. The in vivo occurrence of these disulfide bonds has not been proven experimentally, but if formed, they require reduction prior to covalent heme b addition [40]. Among the Ccm components, CcdA (or DsbD in some species) [41], CcmG and CcmH [42, 43] contain thioredoxin-like motifs (CXXC) involved in dithiol-disulfide oxidoreduction reactions to reduce such disulfide bridges. CcdA is a homolog of the central part of E. coli DsbD, which has additional periplasmic thioredoxin-like domains at its N- and C-terminal ends [44]. CcmG has a N-terminal unprocessed signal peptide that attaches it to the membrane, and a thioredoxin domain that faces the p-side of the membrane. In some archaea, the homolog of CcmG is C-terminally fused to CcdA [45]. Both CcdA and the central part of DsbD have six transmembrane helices, of which the first and fourth ones contain two invariant cysteines. These amino acids are required for transfer of reducing equivalents across the membrane from the cytoplasmic thioredoxin TrxA to the periplasmic CcmG [29, 44]. Similarly, the cysteines of CcmG and the apocyt c heme binding motifs are required for efficient c-type cyt production [42, 46]. Mixed disulfide bond formation in vivo has been detected between CcmG and DsbD in E. coli, and between CcmG and CcdA in Rhodobacter capsulatus, indicating that CcmG and CcdA/DsbD interact directly [44, 47]. Current models support step-wise, mixed disulfide bond formation between TrxA and DsbD, and subsequently between DsbD and CcmG on the n- and p- sides of the membrane, respectively [48]. Remarkably, DsbA-null mutants suppress the c-type cyt deficiency of CcdA-null [49] or CcmG-null mutants [46], indicating that in the absence of DsbA, both CcdA and CcmG are dispensable for cyt c production per se. Such compensatory interactions render these reactions unnecessary in the absence of the thio-oxidation reactions, as presumably apocyts c remain reduced and competent for heme b ligation. Clearly, Module 2 includes DsbA-DsbB and CcdA-CcmG pairs forming a thio-redox loop in bacteria (Figure 5), but CcdA and CcmG are apparently absent in plant mitochondria [14, 18].
Figure 5. Module 2 components of Ccm system.

Module 2 (apocyt c thioredox and chaperoning) is shown together with the Sec translocon (secretion and signal sequence cleavage), the extracytoplasmic oxidative DsbA/DsbB pathway (linked to membrane quinone (Q/QH2) pool) and the reductive CcdA/CcmG pathway (linked to cytoplasmic thioredoxin [TrxA] and NADH). As indicated by black, thin arrows marked with e- the redox loop oxidizes and then reduces the cysteines at the heme binding motifs (C1XXC2H) of apocyt c at the expense of conveying cytoplasmic reducing equivalents to membrane Q/QH2 pool. The DsbA-independent pathway of reduced apocyt c is shown with a dotted arrow, and possible enhanced degradation/protection of reduced or oxidized apocyt c with a “?”. Note that the exact nature of the interactions between reduced (re) or oxidized (ox) CcmG and oxidized or reduced apocyt c is unknown, the “+ ?” is to reflect that the final product of Module 2 is hypothesized to be a reduced disulfide bond containing apocyt c associated with CcmG.
Earlier experiments conducted in vitro with purified soluble variants of Ccm components indicated that reduced CcmG can reduce oxidized CcmH, while an oxidized synthetic apocyt c fragment with a heme binding motif can oxidize a reduced CcmH in bacteria [42] or plant mitochondria [50]. These findings were interpreted as indicating that electrons are shuttled from CcmG to CcmH, and then to the apocyts c to reduce the disulfide bonds at their heme binding motifs [41-43, 51]. However, recent observations questioned the role of CcmH in these reactions. First, no mixed disulfide bonds between CcmG and CcmH or CcmH and apocyt c have so far been observed in vivo. Second, unlike the CcdA-null or CcmG-null mutants, no thio-redox compensation has been evidenced between the DsbA-null and CcmH-null mutants [46]. Third, the recent structure of CcmH indicates that, although the bulk of the protein faces the p-side of the membrane with its C-terminal helix acting as a membrane anchor, it does not have a canonical thioredoxin fold despite its conserved LRCXXCQ motif [52]. These findings suggest that the cysteines of CcmH, which are required for cyt c production [41, 46] might not convey reducing equivalents directly from CcmG to apocyts c to reduce the disulfide bond at the heme binding motifs. Could oxidized apocyt c instead of CcmH be the direct partner of CcmG in vivo, and subsequently, could reduced apocyt c reduce an oxidized CcmH (Figure 6)?
Figure 6. Module 3 components of Ccm system and stereospecific ligation of heme b–apocyt c.

(a) Module 3 (apocyt c-heme b ligation) contains CcmI with its two domains, proposed to interact with apocyt c (provided by Module 2), CcmH proposed to have a disulfide bond, and CcmF known to interact with heme b loaded holoCcmE (provided by Module 1). (b) Upon formation of a mixed disulfide bond between the Cys1 of reduced apocyt c and oxidized CcmH, Cys2 of apocyt c is free to react with vinyl-4 of heme b to yield the first vinyl-4~Cys2 thioether linkage, while His of the heme binding motif coordinates the oxidized heme iron (Fe ox) (c). Following reduction of heme iron proposed to occur via CcmF/QH2 (d), vinyl-2 of heme b is released from CcmE, and the CcmH–apocyt c mixed disulfide bond is resolved (e), leading to the formation of the second vinyl-2~Cys1 thioether linkage and regeneration of oxidized CcmH (f). Upon subsequent folding of correctly ligated heme b-apocyt c, holocyt c is produced. For a more detailed description of this hypothetical model, see the text and Sanders et al. [64].
Biochemical and structural studies of the CcmG homolog CcsX/ResA (a System II component) indicated that it forms a cavity close to its active site upon its reduction. This cavity was proposed to act as a clamp for the histidine residue of the apocyt c heme binding motif to provide a mechanism for recognition, binding and reduction of apocyt c by CcsX/ResA [53, 54]. Moreover, a cysteine-less (i.e. thioreduction-defective) derivative of CcmG significantly increases holocyt c production in vivo when expressed in R. capsulatus DsbA-null and CcmG-null double mutants [46]. Thus, CcmG might act as both a thioredoxin to reduce the disulfide bonds at the heme binding motifs and also as a chaperone (“holdase”) to convey reduced apocyts c to the heme ligation sites (Figures 5 and 6).
Module 3: apocyt c and heme b ligation processes
In the Ccm system the process of heme b-apocyt c ligation per se has been attributed specifically to CcmF and CcmH in E. coli [55], CcmF, CcmH and CcmI in R. capsulatus [56], and CcmFN1, CcmFN2, CcmFC and CcmH [57] components in Arabidopsis thaliana mitochondria, and these might form multi-subunit complexes (Figure 2). Note that the E. coli CcmH [41] is a fusion protein between CcmH and the C-terminal portion of CcmI found in other organisms [58]. Moreover, in plant mitochondria, the bacterial CcmF homolog is split into multiple proteins (e.g. into CcmFN1, CcmFN2 and CcmFC in A. thaliana) while a CcmI homolog is apparently absent [18]. Thus, the numbers of subunits that form Module 3 differ among species. CcmI is a bipartite membrane protein thought to be involved in periplasmic apocyt c chaperoning (Figure 6) [59]. It contains two N-terminal transmembrane helices encompassing a leucine zipper-like motif in its cytoplasmic loop (CcmI-1), and a large periplasmic C-terminal extension (CcmI-2) decorated with tetratricopeptide repeat (TPR)-motifs to facilitate protein-protein interactions [58]. CcmI-1 is required for the biogenesis of all c-type cyst, while CcmI-2 is dispensable for the C-terminally membrane-anchored cyt c1 [59]. Recently, the C-terminal portion of the pentaheme cyt c NrfA was shown to be associated with the CcmI orthologue NrfG via a TPR domain [60]. Whether this is also the case for the TPR motifs of CcmI-2, possibly interacting with apocyt c remains to be seen. Remarkably, CcmI-null mutants are suppressed by overproduction of CcmF, CcmH and CcmG via distinct, synergistic events [61]. In R. capsulatus, overproduction of CcmF and CcmH, or of CcmI-1, partially overcomes the CcmI defect, while additional overproduction of CcmG, CcmI-2 or apocyt c2 overcomes it fully [58, 61, 62]. Thus, CcmI could act as a bridging component between Module 2 and Module 3, which is also implied by the fusion structure of E. coli CcmH. In this scenario, the CcmI-1 domain could perform the heme ligation function of the Ccm system (with CcmF and CcmH) and the CcmI-2 domain the apocyt c thio-redox (with CcmG) function of the Ccm system [10].
CcmF is a large integral membrane protein, and like CcmC (Module 1), it belongs to the putative heme handling protein (HHP) family (Figure 6) [31]. Kranz et al. discussed in detail its topology [15], periplasmic tryptophan-rich (WWD) signature motif, and essential histidine residues for its heme b cofactor [55]. Note that E. coli CcmF co-immunoprecipitates with holoCcmE or CcmH (both E. coli and A. thaliana homologs) but not with apocyt c, and no interaction has been seen between holoCcmE and CcmH [50, 55]. Similarly, CcmF, CcmH and CcmI, but not CcmG could be co-purified from solubilized R. capsulatus membranes, where they might be part of a high molecular weight complex (~800 kDa) [58]. Equally, the WWD domain-containing plant mitochondrial counterpart of CcmF, CcmFN2, interacts in a yeast two-hybrid approach with CcmFN1, CcmFC, CcmH, and also with apocyts c and c1, while CcmH interacts with CcmFN1 and apocyt c in A. thaliana [50, 57]. In wheat (Triticum aestivum) mitochondria CcmFC has been found in a ~700 kDa complex [63], whereas in A. thaliana mitochondria, CcmFN1, CcmFN2, CcmFC and CcmH have been identified in a ~500 kDa complex [50, 57]. Currently, the exact composition of these large molecular weight complexes are undefined, but their co-occurrence with holoCcmE, CcmF, CcmG, CcmH, CcmI and apocyt c supports the idea that they might be involved in the catalysis of the terminal steps of heme b-apocyt c ligation.
A mechanistic view for heme-apocyt c ligation
In all cyts c, the vinyl-2 and -4 are always attached specifically to the N- and C-terminally located Cys1 and Cys2 of apocyt c heme binding motifs. The mechanism underlying this ubiquitous specificity of heme b–apocyt c ligation is unknown. The possibility that CcmH might not be the direct target of CcmG in vivo suggested to us that, together with holoCcmE, CcmH and its essential Cys residues might ensure this specificity (Figure 6) [64]. Considered that Module 1 attaches heme b via its vinyl-2 group to holoCcmE (Figure 4), only the vinyl-4 group is available to form the first thioether bond with a free cysteine at the apocyt c heme-binding motif (Figure 6a). Thus, we surmise that the oxidized CcmH acts as a specific dithiol-disulfide oxidoreductase for reduced apocyt c (which might be either free or held by CcmG), trapping the Cys1 of the C1XXC2H motif in an intermolecular disulfide bond (Figure 6b). If so, then the stereospecifically correct thio-ether bond between the vinyl-4 of heme b and the C-terminal Cys2 of apocyt c becomes obligatory, and could occur subsequent to heme b reduction via CcmF (Figure 6c-f) [65] ensuring the stereospecifically correct thioether bonds formation. The sequence of these events is further described in the legend of Figure 6. Although this hypothetical model is far from being established, the atypical thioredoxin structure of the Pseudomonas aeruginosa CcmH periplasmic domain with its disulfide bond as described earlier [52] renders this idea worthy of experimental scrutiny.
Conclusions and future perspectives
In recent years, our understanding of how cells carry out the seemingly simple task of forming thioether bonds between heme b and apocyts c to yield cyts c has progressed enormously. This process looks unnecessarily convoluted at first sight, but a closer inspection indicates that the Ccm components could be grouped into three conserved units, presenting heme b (Module 1) and apocyt c (Module 2) as ligation-competent substrates to a third entity that carries out covalent and specific heme b-apocyt c ligation (Module 3). The apparent complexity of the Ccm system might be a mere reflection of the different life styles that organisms evolved to manage similar chemical necessities in different cellular compartments and physiological redox homeostasis, extending from extreme anaerobiosis to degrees of aerobiosis. With significant progress at hand, the general outlines of the Ccm process are now shaping up, its essential components are being well-defined, and mechanistic issues between them are appearing as timely targets for future investigations to better understand this important process. Organization of the overall Ccm process into simpler functional modules that perform defined tasks might allow more in-depth studies of each unit. Clearly, we need to solve the three-dimensional structures of the components and modules, and define the temporal and spatial interactions between the players. Perhaps the time is now ripe to initiate the development of a well-defined in vitro system with catalytic thioether bond formation capabilities using holoCcmE and a proper apocyt c as substrates. Although this effort might not be facile or rapid, achieving this daunting task surely will allow a unique and much needed opportunity to tackle related mechanistic questions in-depth (Box 1). In the meantime, sustained progress in deciphering the riddles of the Ccm system continues to pave the road towards a basic understanding of efficient production of c-type cyts that have broad biological significance and important implications for energy-related applications.
Box 1. Outstanding questions.
What are the exact composition, stoichiometry, specific cargo and transport activities of the heme delivery Module 1 that involves CcmA, CcmB, CcmC, CcmD and CcmE?
Does the loading of heme b to CcmE, and its unloading from holoCcmE, require only CcmC-CcmD and CcmF, respectively?
Do the constituents of each module form stable complexes? Do the modules interact with each other?
If the iron of heme b on holoCcmE is in its oxidized state, then how is it reduced to facilitate thioether bond formation? Is there a need for a heme iron reductase activity in vivo, and could CcmF carry out this reaction as a QH2: heme oxidoreductase as proposed?
Which component(s) of Module 2 directly interact with an apocyt c during its thioredox shuffling and delivery to heme ligation Module 3?
Do CcmG and CcmH directly interact with each other? If not, could they interact indirectly via apocyt c linking them together?
Between which components, and in which order, are mixed disulfide bonds formed all the way from the secretion to the delivery of apocyt c to Module 3?
What is the validity of the “sterospecific heme ligation” model, and in particular, does CcmH provide a disulfide bond to form a mixed disulfide with the Cys1 of the heme binding motif of an apocyt c, to ensure stereo-specific heme b incorporation?
Although not essential for heme b ligation, does the presence of a disulfide bond in apocyt c protect against its periplasmic degradation?
Acknowledgments
This work is supported by grants to FD from DOE (91ER 20052) and NIH (GM 38237).
Glossary
- c-type cytochromes (cyts c)
are typically characterized by the covalent attachment of heme b to polypeptide through one or, more generally, two thioether bonds with the Cys residues of a C1XXC2H motif. In many Gram-negative bacteria, the heme is ligated to the polypeptide by a periplasmic process conducted by the cytochrome c maturation (Ccm) proteins.
- Cytochrome c maturation (Ccm) system
refers to post-translational and post-export protein modification processes that involve up to ten (CcmABCDEFGHI and CcdA) components in most Gram-negative bacteria.
- Heme b
the most abundant metalloprotoporphyrin (iron-protoporphyrin IX) of the prosthetic group of hemoproteins, such as hemoglobins, peroxidases and cytochromes.
- Thioether bond
a covalent chemical bond formed by a cysteine thiol side chain of a polypeptide and a vinyl group of heme b. In c-type cytochromes, thioether bonds are always formed between the vinyl at positions 2 and 4 of the tetrapyrrole ring of heme b and the thiols of the N- and C-terminal cysteines (Cys1 and Cys2), respectively, of a conserved heme-binding motif (C1XXC2H) within apocytochrome c.
- Cytochrome c-type heme ligation complex
a set of proteins that carry out covalent ligation of heme b to an apocytochrome c.
Footnotes
Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
References
- 1.Pettigrew GW, Moore GR. Biological Aspects. Springer Verlag; 1987. Cytochrome c. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Scott R.a., Mauk AG. A multidisciplinary approach. University Science Books; 1995. Cytochrome c. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Wang Y, et al. MauG, a novel diheme protein required for tryptophan tryptophylquinone biogenesis. Biochemistry. 2003;42:7318–7325. doi: 10.1021/bi034243q. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Mueller GP, Driscoll WJ. In vitro synthesis of oleoylglycine by cytochrome c points to a novel pathway for the production of lipid signaling molecules. J Biol Chem. 2007;282:22364–22369. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M701801200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Bowman SE, Bren KL. The chemistry and biochemistry of heme c: functional bases for covalent attachment. Nat Prod Rep. 2008;25:1118–1130. doi: 10.1039/b717196j. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Jiang X, Wang X. Cytochrome c-mediated apoptosis. Annu Rev Biochem. 2004;73:87–106. doi: 10.1146/annurev.biochem.73.011303.073706. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Kranz R, et al. Molecular mechanisms of cytochrome c biogenesis: three distinct systems. Mol Microbiol. 1998;29:383–396. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.1998.00869.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Thony-Meyer L. Biogenesis of respiratory cytochromes in bacteria. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 1997;61:337–376. doi: 10.1128/mmbr.61.3.337-376.1997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Allen JW, et al. Variant c-type cytochromes as probes of the substrate specificity of the E. coli cytochrome c maturation (Ccm) apparatus. Biochem J. 2009;419:177–184. 172. doi: 10.1042/BJ20081999. following 184. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Sanders C, Turkaslan S, Onder O, Frawley ER, Kranz RG, Koch HG, Daldal F. Biogenesis of c-type cytochromes and cytochrome complexes. In: Hunter CN, Daldal F, Thurnauer MC, Beatty JT, editors. The Purple Phototrophic Bacteria. 2009. pp. 407–423. [Google Scholar]
- 11.Allen JW, et al. A cytochrome b562 variant with a c-type cytochrome CXXCH heme-binding motif as a probe of the Escherichia coli cytochrome c maturation system. J Biol Chem. 2003;278:52075–52083. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M307196200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Turkarslan S, et al. Extracytoplasmic prosthetic group ligation to apoproteins: maturation of c-type cytochromes. Mol Microbiol. 2006;60:537–541. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2006.05148.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Ferguson SJ, et al. Cytochrome c assembly: a tale of ever increasing variation and mystery? Biochim Biophys Acta. 2008;1777:980–984. doi: 10.1016/j.bbabio.2008.03.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Hamel P, et al. Biochemical requirements for the maturation of mitochondrial c-type cytochromes. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2009;1793:125–138. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2008.06.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Kranz RG, et al. Cytochrome c biogenesis: mechanisms for covalent modifications and trafficking of heme and for heme-iron redox control. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2009;73:510–528. doi: 10.1128/MMBR.00001-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Beckett CS, et al. Four genes are required for the system II cytochrome c biogenesis pathway in Bordetella pertussis, a unique bacterial model. Mol Microbiol. 2000;38:465–481. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2000.02174.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Le Brun NE, et al. Genes required for cytochrome c synthesis in Bacillus subtilis. Mol Microbiol. 2000;36:638–650. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2000.01883.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Giege P, et al. Cytochrome c biogenesis in mitochondria. Mitochondrion. 2008;8:61–73. doi: 10.1016/j.mito.2007.10.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Kuras R, et al. A specific c-type cytochrome maturation system is required for oxygenic photosynthesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007;104:9906–9910. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0702340104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Yu J, Le Brun NE. Studies of the cytochrome subunits of menaquinone:cytochrome c reductase (bc complex) of Bacillus subtilis. Evidence for the covalent attachment of heme to the cytochrome b subunit. J Biol Chem. 1998;273:8860–8866. doi: 10.1074/jbc.273.15.8860. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Allen JW, et al. Maturation of the unusual single-cysteine (XXXCH) mitochondrial c-type cytochromes found in trypanosomatids must occur through a novel biogenesis pathway. Biochem J. 2004;383:537–542. doi: 10.1042/BJ20040832. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Allen JW, et al. Order within a mosaic distribution of mitochondrial c-type cytochrome biogenesis systems? Febs J. 2008;275:2385–2402. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-4658.2008.06380.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Rurek M. Proteins involved in maturation pathways of plant mitochondrial and plastid c-type cytochromes. Acta Biochim Pol. 2008;55:417–433. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Schulz H, et al. Prototype of a heme chaperone essential for cytochrome c maturation. Science. 1998;281:1197–1200. doi: 10.1126/science.281.5380.1197. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Arnesano F, et al. Solution structure and characterization of the heme chaperone CcmE. Biochemistry. 2002;41:13587–13594. doi: 10.1021/bi026362w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Enggist E, et al. NMR structure of the heme chaperone CcmE reveals a novel functional motif. Structure. 2002;10:1551–1557. doi: 10.1016/s0969-2126(02)00885-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Lee D, et al. Unusual heme-histidine bond in the active site of a chaperone. J Am Chem Soc. 2005;127:3716–3717. doi: 10.1021/ja044658e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Harvat EM, et al. Probing the Heme-binding site of the cytochrome c maturation protein CcmE. Biochemistry. 2009 doi: 10.1021/bi801609a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Deshmukh M, et al. Novel Rhodobacter capsulatus genes required for the biogenesis of various c-type cytochromes. Mol Microbiol. 2000;35:123–138. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2000.01683.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Allen JW, et al. A variant System I for cytochrome c biogenesis in archaea and some bacteria has a novel CcmE and no CcmH. FEBS Lett. 2006;580:4827–4834. doi: 10.1016/j.febslet.2006.07.073. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Lee JH, et al. Evolutionary origins of members of a superfamily of integral membrane cytochrome c biogenesis proteins. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2007;1768:2164–2181. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamem.2007.04.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Schulz H, et al. Heme transfer to the heme chaperone CcmE during cytochrome c maturation requires the CcmC protein, which may function independently of the ABC-transporter CcmAB. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999;96:6462–6467. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.11.6462. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Ahuja U, Thony-Meyer L. CcmD is involved in complex formation between CcmC and the heme chaperone CcmE during cytochrome c maturation. J Biol Chem. 2005;280:236–243. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M410912200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Feissner RE, et al. ABC transporter-mediated release of a haem chaperone allows cytochrome c biogenesis. Mol Microbiol. 2006;61:219–231. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2006.05221.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Christensen O, et al. Loss of ATP hydrolysis activity by CcmAB results in loss of c-type cytochrome synthesis and incomplete processing of CcmE. Febs J. 2007;274:2322–2332. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-4658.2007.05769.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Goldman BS, et al. Molecular and immunological analysis of an ABC transporter complex required for cytochrome c biogenesis. J Mol Biol. 1997;268:724–738. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1997.0992. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Rayapuram N, et al. AtCCMA interacts with AtCcmB to form a novel mitochondrial ABC transporter involved in cytochrome c maturation in Arabidopsis. J Biol Chem. 2007;282:21015–21023. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M704091200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Throne-Holst M, et al. Escherichia coli ccm in-frame deletion mutants can produce periplasmic cytochrome b but not cytochrome c. FEBS Lett. 1997;410:351–355. doi: 10.1016/s0014-5793(97)00656-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Gao T, O’Brian MR. Control of DegP-dependent degradation of c-type cytochromes by heme and the cytochrome c maturation system in Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol. 2007;189:6253–6259. doi: 10.1128/JB.00656-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Daltrop O, et al. In vitro formation of a c-type cytochrome. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002;99:7872–7876. doi: 10.1073/pnas.132259099. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Fabianek RA, et al. Periplasmic protein thiol:disulfide oxidoreductases of Escherichia coli. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2000;24:303–316. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6976.2000.tb00544.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Monika EM, et al. A thioreduction pathway tethered to the membrane for periplasmic cytochromes c biogenesis; in vitro and in vivo studies. J Mol Biol. 1997;271:679–692. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1997.1227. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Reid E, et al. The Escherichia coli CcmG protein fulfils a specific role in cytochrome c assembly. Biochem J. 2001;355:51–58. doi: 10.1042/0264-6021:3550051. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Katzen F, et al. Evolutionary domain fusion expanded the substrate specificity of the transmembrane electron transporter DsbD. EMBO J. 2002;21:3960–3969. doi: 10.1093/emboj/cdf405. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Bertini I, et al. Evolution of mitochondrial-type cytochrome c domains and of the protein machinery for their assembly. J Inorg Biochem. 2007;101:1798–1811. doi: 10.1016/j.jinorgbio.2007.02.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Turkarslan S, et al. Compensatory thio-redox interactions between DsbA, CcdA and CcmG unveil the apocytochrome c holdase role of CcmG during cytochrome c maturation. Mol Microbiol. 2008;70:652–666. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2008.06441.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Stirnimann CU, et al. Structural basis and kinetics of DsbD-dependent cytochrome c maturation. Structure. 2005;13:985–993. doi: 10.1016/j.str.2005.04.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Cho SH, Beckwith J. Two snapshots of electron transport across the membrane: insights into the structure and function of DsbD. J Biol Chem. 2009;284:11416–11424. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M900651200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Deshmukh M, et al. The dithiol:disulfide oxidoreductases DsbA and DsbB of Rhodobacter capsulatus are not directly involved in cytochrome c biogenesis, but their inactivation restores the cytochrome c biogenesis defect of CcdA-null mutants. J Bacteriol. 2003;185:3361–3372. doi: 10.1128/JB.185.11.3361-3372.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Meyer EH, et al. AtCCMH, an essential component of the c-type cytochrome maturation pathway in Arabidopsis mitochondria, interacts with apocytochrome c. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005;102:16113–16118. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0503473102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Setterdahl AT, et al. Oxidation-reduction properties of disulfide-containing proteins of the Rhodobacter capsulatus cytochrome c biogenesis system. Biochemistry. 2000;39:10172–10176. doi: 10.1021/bi000663t. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Di Matteo A, et al. A strategic protein in cytochrome c maturation: three-dimensional structure of CcmH and binding to apocytochrome c. J Biol Chem. 2007;282:27012–27019. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M702702200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Crow A, et al. Structural basis of redox-coupled protein substrate selection by the cytochrome c biosynthesis protein ResA. J Biol Chem. 2004;279:23654–23660. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M402823200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Colbert CL, et al. Mechanism of substrate specificity in Bacillus subtilis ResA, a thioredoxin-like protein involved in cytochrome c maturation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006;103:4410–4415. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0600552103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Ren Q, et al. A bacterial cytochrome c heme lyase. CcmF forms a complex with the heme chaperone CcmE and CcmH but not with apocytochrome c. J Biol Chem. 2002;277:7657–7663. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M110979200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Sanders C, et al. The cytochrome c maturation components CcmF, CcmH, and CcmI form a membrane-integral multisubunit heme ligation complex. J Biol Chem. 2008;283:29715–29722. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M805413200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Rayapuram N, et al. The three mitochondrial encoded CcmF proteins form a complex that interacts with CCMH and c-type apocytochromes in Arabidopsis. J Biol Chem. 2008;283:25200–25208. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M802621200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Sanders C, et al. Overproduction of CcmG and CcmFH(Rc) fully suppresses the c-type cytochrome biogenesis defect of Rhodobacter capsulatus CcmI-null mutants. J Bacteriol. 2005;187:4245–4256. doi: 10.1128/JB.187.12.4245-4256.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Lang SE, et al. Rhodobacter capsulatus CycH: a bipartite gene product with pleiotropic effects on the biogenesis of structurally different c-type cytochromes. J Bacteriol. 1996;178:5279–5290. doi: 10.1128/jb.178.17.5279-5290.1996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Han D, et al. TPR domain of NrfG mediates complex formation between heme lyase and formate-dependent nitrite reductase in Escherichia coli O157:H7. Proteins. 2008;70:900–914. doi: 10.1002/prot.21597. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Sanders C, et al. Membrane-spanning and periplasmic segments of CcmI have distinct functions during cytochrome c Biogenesis in Rhodobacter capsulatus. J Bacteriol. 2007;189:789–800. doi: 10.1128/JB.01441-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Deshmukh M, et al. Overexpression of ccl1-2 can bypass the need for the putative apocytochrome chaperone CycH during the biogenesis of c-type cytochromes. Mol Microbiol. 2002;46:1069–1080. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2002.03212.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Giege P, et al. CcmF(C) involved in cytochrome c maturation is present in a large sized complex in wheat mitochondria. FEBS Lett. 2004;563:165–169. doi: 10.1016/S0014-5793(04)00291-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Sanders C, et al. Periplasmic oxidative folding and cytochrome c maturation: A mechanistic view of stereo-selective heme attachment. In: VAN DER EST, BRUCE, editors. Photosynthesis: Fundamental Aspects and Global Perspectives. Lawrence; KS, USA: 2005. pp. 421–424. [Google Scholar]
- 65.Richard-Fogal CL, et al. A conserved haem redox and trafficking pathway for cofactor attachment. EMBO J. 2009;28:2349–2359. doi: 10.1038/emboj.2009.189. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

