Skip to main content
. 2010 May 10;12(3):R26. doi: 10.1186/bcr2570

Table 3.

Unadjusted models for DFS and OS1

Gene/Clinical Comparison Unadjusted DFS Unadjusted OS
HR (95% CI) Wald P-value HR (95% CI) Wald P-value

CYP2B6 Any variant vs. All WT 1.10 (0.83, 1.46) 0.51 1.12 (0.83, 1.52) 0.46
CYP2C9 Any variant vs. All WT 0.97 (0.72, 1.29) 0.82 1.01 (0.75, 1.37) 0.94
CYP2D6 G/A vs. A/A 1.07 (0.57, 2.03) 0.83 1.30 (0.64, 2.62) 0.46
G/G vs. A/A 0.89 (0.48, 1.65) 0.72 1.01 (0.51, 1.99) 0.98
CYP3A4 *1B/*1A vs. *1A/*1A 1.70 (1.10, 2.63) 0.02 1.21 (0.74, 1.96) 0.45
*1B/*1B vs *1A/*1A 1.96 (0.96, 3.98) 0.07 1.64 (0.77, 3.50) 0.20
CYP3A5 *3/*1 vs. *1/*1 0.76 (0.36, 1.59) 0.47 1.18 (0.49, 2.84) 0.72
*3/*3 vs. *1/*1 0.74 (0.38, 1.45) 0.38 1.18 (0.52, 2.67) 0.69
CYP3A5 *6/*1 vs. *1/*1 2.71 (1.01, 7.32) 0.05 2.47 (0.92, 6.66) 0.07
GSTM1 Null vs. Non-null 0.71 (0.54, 0.93) 0.02 0.71 (0.53, 0.94) 0.02
GSTT1 Null vs. Non-null 1.41 (1.00, 1.97) 0.05 1.31 (0.91, 1.88) 0.14
GSTP1 Any Var vs. All WT 1.03 (0.79, 1.36) 0.81 1.18 (0.88, 1.57) 0.27
CYP-GST genotype groups Unfavorable vs. Intermediate or Favorable 1.29 (0.97-1.72) 0.08 1.32 (0.98-1.79) 0.07
Lymph node Continuous 1.02 (1.00, 1.04) 0.06 1.02 (1.00, 1.04) 0.10
Tumor size Continuous 1.00 (1.00, 1.01) 0.36 1.00 (1.00, 1.01) 0.13
Age Continuous 0.99 (0.97, 1.00) 0.10 0.99 (0.97, 1.01) 0.28
ER Pos vs. Neg 0.79 (0.60, 1.04) 0.10 0.78 (0.58, 1.04) 0.10
PR Pos vs. Neg 0.82 (0.62, 1.07) 0.15 0.88 (0.66, 1.17) 0.37
Race Black vs. White 1.44 (0.84, 2.48) 0.19 1.41 (0.80, 2.49) 0.23
Other vs. White 1.49 (0.83, 2.68) 0.18 1.20 (0.64, 2.28) 0.57
Arm CAF+HDC vs. CAF 0.79 (0.60, 1.03) 0.08 0.93 (0.70, 1.23) 0.59

1Cox Regression

CAF: cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, fluorouracil; DFS: disease free survival; ER: estrogen receptor; HDC: high dose chemotherapy; HR: hazard ratio; PR: progesterone receptor; OS: overall survival