Skip to main content
. 2010 Jul 14;37(8):4102–4109. doi: 10.1118/1.3426000

Table 7.

Median and range, in parentheses, of measurement precision of CTDI100,air, HVL, QVL, and CTDIw (for a 16 and 32 cm CTDI phantom) calculated values. Within-run precision was only evaluated for CTDI100,air data (collected using the techniques that appear in Table 2), thus “-” is shown for all other dosimetry metrics. Between-run and between-scanner individual %CVs were calculated from data collected at a given technique (shown in Tables 3, 4, 5 for CTDI100,air, HVL and QVL, and CTDIw, respectively) on the same make and model of scanner.

Dosimetry metric Scanner make and model Intrascanner precision, CV (%) Interscanner (between-scanner) precision, CV (%)
Within-run Between-run (weekly) Between-run (quarterly∕triannual)a
CTDI100,air GE VCT 0.05 0.52 0.58 1.83
  (0.04–0.11) (0.10–0.76) (0.47–1.04) (0.92–4.33)
GE LightSpeed 16 0.08 0.12 2.31 0.79
(0.06–0.10) (0.01–1.13) (2.12–3.13) (0.50–1.95)
Siemens Sensation 64 0.19 0.47 1.76 1.46
(0.00–0.86) (0.25–0.63) (1.26–2.39) (0.31–3.06)
HVL GE VCT - 0.19 0.42 0.73
  (0.02–1.86) (0.20–2.19) (0.13–2.74)
GE LightSpeed 16 - 0.22 0.77 0.83
  (0.08–1.46) (0.36–1.04) (0.51–2.03)
Siemens Sensation 64 - 0.24 0.92 1.04
  (0.06–0.75) (0.67–1.17) (0.30–1.71)
QVL GE VCT - 0.37 0.43 0.66
  (0.05–0.76) (0.11–0.50) (0.25–1.41)
GE LightSpeed 16 - 0.30 0.47 0.59
  (0.08–0.72) (0.29–1.08) (0.35–0.94)
Siemens Sensation 64 - 0.19 0.54 0.79
  (0.02–0.83) (0.31–0.67) (0.28–1.14)
CTDIw(16 cm CTDI phantom) GE VCT - 0.70 1.32 1.71
  (0.11–1.70) (0.83–1.45) (0.65–3.01)
GE LightSpeed 16 - 0.38 2.79 0.94
  (0.08–1.06) (2.44–2.88) (0.35–1.52)
Siemens Sensation 64 - 1.14 2.54 1.49
  (0.88–3.77) (1.92–3.64) (0.29–3.41)
CTDIw(32 cm CTDI phantom) GE VCT - 1.19 0.84 1.73
  (0.39–2.53) (0.61–1.84) (0.51–3.44)
GE LightSpeed 16 - 1.23 2.47 1.09
  (0.34–2.29) (1.25–2.79) (0.62–2.22)
Siemens Sensation 64 - 0.62 2.08 1.95
  (0.24–1.43) (1.30–3.07) (0.59–4.11)
a

Between-run (quarterly) precision was assessed for the Siemens scanners, which were tested at site B; between-run (triannual) precision was assessed for both models of GE scanners tested at site A.