Skip to main content
. 2010 Jul 16;81(4):407–412. doi: 10.3109/17453674.2010.501739

Table 4.

Relative risks of aseptic stem revision during entire observation period (Lubinus SP, Spectron EF Primary) or within 3 years (Exeter) and 95% CI for implant-related parameters for each stem type. Data from Cox regression adjusted for age, sex, diagnosis, bilaterality, side, and implant-specific parameters (see text). Implant-related parameters with statistically significant influence are shown

Relative Risk 95% CI p-value
[Exp (B)] Lower Upper
Exeter polished (n = 21,008)
  Femoral head diameter
  22 mm 2.37 1.32 4.23 0.004
  26 mm 0.02 0.00 30.03 0.3
  28 mm, reference 1.00
  30 mm 0.79 0.19 3.28 0.7
Lubinus SPII (n = 43,036)
 Size
  x-small 1.72 1.22 2.44 0.002
  small 0.99 0.74 1.32 0.9
  medium, reference 1.00
  large 0.94 0.70 1.26 0.7
  x and xx-large 1.01 0.69 1.47 1.0
 Head
  ceramic 0.52 0.36 0.76 0.001
  cobalt-chromium, reference 1.00
 Offset + neck
  1 0.73 0.55 0.97 0.03
  2 reference 1.00
  3 1.11 0.86 1.43 0.4
  4 1.72 1.09 2.71 0.02
Spectron EF Primary (n = 7,140)
 Size
  1 2.23 1.25 3.97 0.006
  2 reference 1.00
  3 0.75 0.40 1.41 0.4
  4+5 0.55 0.17 1.84 0.3
 Off-set + neck
  1 1.27 0.68 2.37 0.4
  2 reference 1.00
  3 1.54 0.80 2.98 0.2
  4 2.03 0.81 5.11 0.1
  5 6.89 2.54 18.63 < 0.001