Skip to main content
. 2010 Aug 9;5(8):e12092. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0012092

Figure 2. Probabilistic niche model results for the Benguela food web.

Figure 2

Feeding links in the empirical data set and feeding probabilities in the probabilistic niche model for the maximum likelihood estimate (MLE) parameter set. On the x-axis, predators are ordered by their estimated (MLE) ci values; on the y-axis, prey are ordered by their estimated (MLE) ni values. Model predictions, calculated at the MLE, are shown as the grey circles: the area of each circle is proportional to P(nj, ri, ci), the probability that i eats j. Apparent missing grey circles simply correspond to very low values of P(nj, ri, ci). Observations are shown in black: a black circle is shown for those feeding relationships that have been observed. A match between large grey circles, and the black circles, implies a close match between model and data. Two predators with poorly predicted prey (expected fraction of prey links ≤0.65), other pelagic and chub mackerel, are labelled with arrows. Six prey species with poorly predicted predators (expected fraction of predator links ≤0.65) are labelled with arrows: from bottom to top, gelatinous zooplankton, bacteria, macrozooplankton, snoek, sharks and kob.