TABLE 2.
Pseudomonas strain |
De novo biosynthesized compatible solute results |
Uptake/conversion of betainec | Reference(s) | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Alanine | Glutamateb | NAGGN | Trehalose | Mannitol | Glucosyl- glycerol | Ectoine | OH- ectoine | |||
P. aeruginosa ATCC 17933 | + | ND/ND | 34 | |||||||
P. aeruginosa PAO1 | + | + | + | U/C | 22 | |||||
P. chlororaphis L10-2-1a | + | + | ND/ND | 53 | ||||||
P. fluorescens | + | + | + | ND/ND | 75 | |||||
P. fluorescens ATCC 11250 | + | ND/ND | 34 | |||||||
P. fluorescens DSM 8569a | + | + | ND/ND | 53 | ||||||
P. fluorescens DSM 50090T | + | + | −/C | This study | ||||||
P. fluorescens EPS62e | + | + | + | U/ND | 10 | |||||
P. fluorescens Pf-5 | + | + | U/C | This study | ||||||
P. fluorescens ST | + | ND/ND | 34 | |||||||
P. halophila DSM 3050 | + | + | ND/C | 72 | ||||||
P. halosaccharolytica CCM 2851 | + | + | + | U/C | 72 | |||||
P. mendocina ATCC 25411 | + | + | + | ND/ND | 62 | |||||
P. mendocina SKB70 | + | + | + | U/ND | 62 | |||||
P. pseudoalcaligenes ATCC 14440 | + | + | + | ND/ND | 62 | |||||
P. psychrotolerans BO001 | + | + | + | + | −/− | 31; this study | ||||
P. putida Idaho NRRL B-18435 | + | + | + | ND/ND | 34 | |||||
P. putida L30-3-8a | + | + | ND/ND | 53 | ||||||
P. putida PpG1 ATCC 17453 | + | + | + | ND/ND | 34 | |||||
P. putida S12 | + | + | U/ND | 34 | ||||||
P. stutzeri DSM 5190T | + | + | + | + | U/C | 37, 71; this study | ||||
P. syringae L20-3-1a | + | + | ND/ND | 53 | ||||||
P. syringae pv. syringae B728a | + | + | (+)d | U/C | This study | |||||
P. syringae pv. tomato DC3000 | + | + | + | U/C | 25; this study |
Amino acids and other charged osmolytes were not determined in this study.
The role of glutamate as a compatible solute is under debate (70).
U, uptake occurred; C, conversion occurred; ND, not determined in the corresponding study.
(+), production occurs only when medium conditions mimic in planta conditions.