TABLE 1.

Three separate models using adjusted logistic regression analyses of acculturation measures and HPV infection risk among US Latinas and US Mexican American Women^*

	Latinas (n=457)			Mexican American Women (n=407)
	Any HPV+ OR (95% CI)	High Risk HPV+ OR (95% CI)	Sobel- Goodman Mediation <1 sex. partner vs. > 1	Any HPV + OR (95% CI)	Sobel- Goodman Mediation <1 sex. partner vs. > 1	High Risk HPV + OR (95% CI)	Sobel- Goodman Mediation <1 sex. partner vs. > 1
Short Acculturation Scale (SAS)
Low Language Acculturation (referent)	1.0	1.0		1.0		1.0
High Language Acculturation	1.28 (.76, 2.15)	2.07 (1.18, 3.64)	28.0% (n=239)	1.34 (.75, 2.39)	†	2.48 (1.42 – 4.33)	32.3% (n=219)
Country of Birth
Not born in US states (referent)	1.0	1.0		1.0		1.0
Born in 50 US states or DC	1.40 (.74, 2.63)	2.05 (.76, 5.55)	†	1.49 (.85, 2.62)	†	2.07 (1.03, 4.16)	21.6% (n=209)
Parents Country of Birth
Both Parents Born Outside of US states (Referent)	1.0	1.0		1.0		1.0
1 Parent Born in US 50 states	2.11 (.91, 4.90)	2.2 (.48, 10.0)		1.72 (.97, 3.05)		1.42 (.54, 3.72)
Both Parents Born in US 50 states	1.54 (.70, 3.39)	2.54 (1.07, 6.06)	21.3% (n=204)	2.24 (1.14, 4.39)	22.1% (n=176)	2.98 (1.45, 3.72)	21.4% (n=176)

^*Note: Family income (< or > $20,000) and age (under 18, 18–25, 26–35, 36–45, 46–59) were included as covariates in the logistic regression models. Statistically significant p-values are in bold.

^†The Sobel-Goodman test is only applicable to statistically significant findings.