Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Arch Intern Med. 2009 Sep 28;169(17):1578–1586. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2009.263

Table 1.

Comparison of types of communication, providers and imaging for acknowledged and unacknowledged diagnostic imaging alerts

Unacknowledged
n= 217 (18.1)
Acknowledged
n= 979 (81.9)
p- value
n (%) n (%)
Communication Characteristics p = 0.84
    Electronic Alert Communication* 133 (17.8) 612 (82.2)
    Electronic Alert + Verbal Communication** 35 (17.0) 171 (83.0)
    Electronic Alert + Admission 35 (20.4) 137 (80.0)
    Electronic Alert + Verbal Communication + Admission 14 (19.2) 59 (80.8)
Ordering provider Characteristics p < 0.0001
    Attending physician 100 (14.4) 596 (85.6)
    Physician Assistants 18 (7.5) 223 (92.5)
    Trainees (Interns, Residents, Fellows)^ 94 (49.0) 98 (51.0)
    Nurse Practitioners 5 (7.5) 62 (92.5)
Types of Abnormal Imaging Reported p = 0.0005
    X- ray 75 (13.1) 497 (86.9)
    Ultrasound 25 (24.0) 79 (76.0)
    CT Scan 101 (22.0) 358 (78.0)
    MRI 16 (26.7) 44 (73.3)
    Mammography 0 (0.0) 1 (100.0)
Ordering Provider Specialty p < 0.0001
    Primary Care 85 (14.1) 516 (85.9)
    Emergency Medicine 41 (15.5) 223 (84.5)
    Specialty Surgery 41 (34.2) 79 (65.8)
    Other Medical Specialties 14 (23.0) 47 (77.0)
    Hematology/ Oncology 12 (24.0) 38 (76.0)
    Pulmonary Disease 10 (25.0) 30 (75.0)
    General Surgery 11 (29.0) 27 (71.0)
    Other Non-specified Specialties 3 (13.6) 19 (86.4)
Dual Communication p = <.0001
    Dual 146 (24.0) 461 (76.0)
    Single 71 (12.0) 518 (88.0)
*

Only electronic communication of alert

**

Electronic and verbal communication of alert

Electronic communication of alert followed by a hospital admission prior to chart review

Electronic and verbal communication of alert followed by a hospital admission prior to chart review

^

Trainees who provide care in our outpatient setting do so at an average of ½-1 day every 2 weeks.