Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Arch Intern Med. 2009 Sep 28;169(17):1578–1586. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2009.263

Table 3.

Logistic regression analysis adjusted for clustering for lack of timely follow-up of abnormal diagnostic imaging alerts (all characteristics with p<0.2 in univariate analysis)

Independent Variable p-value OR (95% CI)
Communication Characteristics
    Electronic Alert + Verbal Communication ** 0.0004 0.12 (0.04-0.38)
    Electronic Alert + Admission 0.0035 0.22 (0.08-0.38)
        Referent: Electronic Alert Communication*
Ordering Provider Characteristics
    Physician Assistant 0.45 0.77 (0.39 - 1.55)
    Nurse Practitioner 0.90 1.06 (0.42- 2.7)
    Trainee 0.30 1.49 (0.70- 3.2)
        Referent: Attending physician
Types of Abnormal Imaging Reported
    CT scan 0.01 0.50 (0.29- 0.85)
    MRI 0.18 0.47 (0.16- 1.43)
    Ultrasound 0.91 0.96 (0.44- 2.07)
        Referent: X-ray
Ordering Provider Specialty
    Emergency care 0.22 0.53 (0.20- 1.45)
    Surgery 0.25 0.64 (0.30- 1.37)
    Other specialties 0.10 0.53 (0.25- 1.13)
        Referent: Primary care
Dual vs. Single Communication
    Dual 0.03 1.99 (1.06- 3.50)
        Referent: Single
*

Only electronic communication of alert

**

Electronic and verbal communication of alert

Electronic communication of alert followed by a hospital admission prior to chart review