Skip to main content
. 2010 Jun 23;30(25):8541–8550. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1478-10.2010

Table 1.

Behavioral results

d′ Targets
Lures
Recollected Recollection misses
Familiar Forgotten False alarms Correct rejections
Pilot study
    Total 2.10 (0.09) 56.1% (2.6) 27.8% (1.7) 16.0% (1.8) 16.6% (2.7) 83.4% (2.7)
    SHUT 2.47 (0.14) 58.2% (2.9) 27.0% (2.3) 14.5% (1.8) 12.4% (2.0) 87.6% (2.0)
    GRAY 2.09 (0.14) 57.1% (2.9) 28.3% (2.0) 14.5% (1.8) 20.1% (3.2) 79.9% (3.2)
    VD 1.97 (0.10) 53.1% (2.6) 27.6% (1.7) 19.1% (2.0) 17.3% (2.9) 82.7% (2.9)
fMRI experiment
    Total 1.96 (0.10) 51.0% (1.9) 38.2% (1.6) 10.8% (1.8) 30.0% (3.1) 70.0% (3.1)
    SHUT 2.01 (0.12) 53.9% (2.0) 35.7% (1.9) 10.4% (1.8) 28.5% (3.6) 71.5% (3.6)
    GRAY 1.79 (0.14) 49.3% (2.5) 39.5% (2.1) 11.2% (1.8) 35.2% (4.2) 64.8% (4.2)
    VD 2.08 (0.14) 50.0% (2.3) 39.4% (2.0) 10.6% (2.0) 26.3% (3.8) 73.7% (3.8)

Top, Summary of statistics describing the responses to 168 targets and 36 lures that were presented during the test session of a pilot behavioral study. The mean performance for 27 participants is given in each of the three visual conditions (SEM). Bottom, Summary of statistics describing the behavioral responses from participants in the fMRI experiment. The mean performance for the 23 participants is given in each of the three visual conditions (SEM).

HHS Vulnerability Disclosure