Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Aug 12.
Published in final edited form as: J Med Chem. 2010 Aug 12;53(15):5476–5490. doi: 10.1021/jm100027p

Table 5.

Optimization of Ring A, Ring B, Ring substituents.

graphic file with name nihms-221992-t0010.jpg

Number R1 R2 R4 R5 R8 NR2A
IC50
NR2B
IC50
NR2C
IC50
NR2D
IC50
GluR1
IC50
NR2Aa
NR2D
GluR1b
NR2D
72 * NO2 COOH I >300 >300 2 c 1 c >300 >150 >220
44 NO2 COOH I 18 6 1 0.6 31 30 52
73 NO2 COOH I >300 279 9 8 >300 >37 >37
74 NO2 COOH I 8 11 2 1 21 8 21
75 NO2 COOH OCH3 197 206 13 7 >300 28 >42
46 * NO2 COOH OCH3 229 >300 6 3 >300 76 >100
76 NO2 COOH OCH3 238 238 21 16 >300 15 >19
77 NO2 COOH OCH3 208 >300 24 13 289 16 22

IC50 values in μM were determined by fitting the Hill equation to average composite concentration-effect curves from 7-26 oocytes injected with NR1/NR2A, NR1/NR2B, NR1/NR2C, NR1/NR2D, GluR1 cRNA. Oocytes were obtained from 2-5 frogs. Compounds 44 and 46, previously shown in Table 3, are included to facilitate comparison. IC50 values greater than 300 μM were determined as described in the Experimental Methods.

a

(IC50 NR2A)/(IC50 NR2D)

b

(IC50 GluR1)/(IC50 NR2D)

c

indicates data fitted with variable minimum (see Fig 2B).

*

1 mM 2-hydroxypropyl-β-cyclodextrin was included for 30 and/or 100 μM concentrations of test compound. See Figure S2 (Supporting Information) for full general structure.