Table 5.
Source | Definition of physical activity | Relative riskb | Comments |
---|---|---|---|
Reviews | |||
Lee and Skerrett 2001 | Meeting moderate physical activity recommendation (1,000 kcal/week) | 0.70–0.80 | Review, excluding papers examining only two levels of physical activity |
Kesaniemi et al. 2001 | Expending of 1,000 kcal/week | 0.70 | Based on a symposium; invited experts reviewed the existing literature |
Bauman 2004 | Meeting physical activity recommendation | 0.70 | Review of peer-reviewed studies published between 2000 and 2003 |
Bucksch and Schlicht 2006 | Different definitions of physical activity | 0.70–0.87 (moderate) 0.46–0.92 (vigorous) |
Review |
Warburton et al. 2006 | Meeting physical activity recommendation | 0.65–0.80 | Review |
Vogel et al. 2009 | Different definitions including moderate exercise (4,100–7,908 kJ/week), vigorous exercise, and different distances walked | 0.50–0.77 | Review of adult cohort studies with a mean > 60 years of age |
Studies on cycling | |||
Andersen et al. 2000 | Cycling to work for 3 hr/week | 0.55–0.72 | Based on a Danish cohort, adjusted for leisure time physical activity (among others) |
Hu et al. 2004 | Walking and cycling to work | 0.71–0.79 | Based on a Finnish cohort study among subjects with type 2 diabetes; estimates without adjusting for other domains in physical activity |
Matthews et al. 2007 | Cycling to work (MET-hours/day) | 0.66–0.79 | Based on a Chinese women cohort in Shanghai, adjusted for other physical activity |
Overall summary | 0.50–0.90 |
Reviews used are often overlapping (reviewing the same evidence).
Comparing physically active with physically less active.