Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Addict Behav. 2010 Apr 10;35(9):818–825. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2010.03.021

Table 5.

Psychometric characteristics of the TWEAK in each country (current drinkers)

Sensitivity -S-and Specificity -Sp- for alcohol dependence Correlation with the AUDITa TWEAK Mean and (S.D.) TWEAK Reliabilityb Item p [Proportion of indicator presence] Item discrimination indexc Item discrimination indexd
S % Sp % Item1 Item2 Item3 Item4 Item5 Item1 Item2 Item3 Item4 Item5 Item1 Item2 Item3 Item4 Item5
Arg (n=528) 98 67 .77** 1.07 (1.55) .53 .70 .16 .04 .04 .14 .35 .42 .39 .36 .48 .63 .51 .41 .36 .73
Mex (n=539) 90 98 .64** 1.38 (1.32) .68 .65 .18 .11 .11 .33 .27 .53 .46 .51 .50 .35 .50 .48 .45 .54
US (n=801) 91 81 .86** 2.07(2.24) .71 .94 .40 .16 .17 .40 .40 .61 .56 .57 .56 .41 .66 .54 .55 .63
a

Pearson correlation coefficients

**

Significative at 0.01 (one-tailed).

b

Test reliability estimate by Kuder-Richardson-20 index.

c

Corrected Item-Test Point-Biserial Correlation.

d

D-Value.