Table 7. Trials on intake of types of protein and blood pressure.
Author, year | Study design | Participants | Initial BP (plant protein intervention vs. animal protein intervention) | Type of intervention | ΔProtein | ΔCH | ΔFat | Duration of intervention | ΔBP due to intervention (SBP/DBP) | P-value |
Wheeler, 2002[53] | x, … | 23 type 2 diabetes patients, with albuminuria1 | 151/85 mmHg | Meals with only plant prot vs. meals with 60% nimal and 40% plant prot | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 weeks for each diet | +1/+1 mmHg* | 0.90/0.75 |
Brussaard, 1981[54] | p, … | 49 healthy normotensive students | 123/69 mmHg vs. 124/69 mmHg | Soy prot isolate vs. casein prot isolate (2:1) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 weeks | +0.6/+0.3 mmHg* | NS/NS |
x = cross-over, p = parallel; SBP = systolic blood pressure, DBP = diastolic blood pressure, M = men, F = women, en% = energy percentage; CH = carbohydrates; prot = protein; NS = not statistically significant (p>0.05); … = value not given; *Best guess based on graph/implicit data in paper.
Users of anti-hypertensive medication were not excluded.