Table 4.
Cox Models Showing Hazard Ratios for Dying (N = 13,325)a
Base |
(i–x), Single Covariatesb |
Individual + Community Characteristics |
Adding Ill Health |
Parsimonious Modelc |
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Variable | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
Rural residence | 1.32** | 1.18 | 1.19* | 1.22** | |
Age (ref = 50–54) | |||||
55–59 | 1.43* | 1.40** | 1.37* | 1.40** | |
60–64 | 2.01*** | 1.91*** | 1.86*** | 1.95*** | |
65–69 | 4.03*** | 3.77*** | 3.61*** | 3.82*** | |
70–74 | 6.37*** | 5.82*** | 5.55*** | 6.01*** | |
75–79 | 9.93*** | 8.81*** | 8.31*** | 9.17*** | |
80 + | 22.20*** | 19.05*** | 18.79*** | 21.42*** | |
Gender (1 = male) | 1.49*** | 1.65*** | 1.66*** | 1.53*** | |
Education (ref = more than primary) | |||||
No education | 1.27* | 1.10 | 1.12 | ||
Primary education | 1.11 | 0.99 | 1.01 | ||
Is a cadre | 0.42*** | 0.49** | 0.49** | 0.44*** | |
Occupation (ref = skilled/white collar) | |||||
Unskilled/agricultural | 1.38** | 1.16 | 1.11 | ||
Never worked/other/missing | 1.42** | 1.34* | 1.28 | ||
Wealth quintile (ref = highest) | |||||
Lowest quintile | 1.11 | 0.95 | 0.88 | ||
Second quintile | 1.09 | 1.02 | 0.98 | ||
Third quintile | 1.18 | 1.08 | 1.03 | ||
Fourth quintile | 1.11 | 1.05 | 1.01 | ||
Has insurance | 0.83* | 0.92 | 0.88 | ||
Log average wage | 0.89** | 0.89** | 0.86*** | 0.89** | |
Number of amenities | 0.94*** | 0.95** | 0.94*** | 0.94*** | |
Number medical facilities | 1.01 | 1.01 | 1.01 | ||
Distance to nearest facility (ref = 0–.50 km) | |||||
.51–2.00 km | 0.99 | 0.97 | 1.00 | ||
2.01+ km | 1.10 | 1.06 | 1.07 | ||
Missing distance information | 0.78* | 0.80 | 0.83 | ||
Ill health | 2.06*** | 2.15*** | 2.15*** | ||
LL | −6824.3 | −6808.0 | −6775.6 | −6781.7 | |
Δ −2LL from base | 32.7*** | 94.4*** | 84.2*** | ||
θ | 0.111*** | 0.093*** | 0.103*** | 0.112*** |
Notes: i−x = 10 models (i−x), each of which includes base plus one additional covariate; LL = log likelihood.
Results of a shared frailty hazard model with standard errors of hazard ratios conditional on θ. N based on number of measured episodes.
Results represent a series of models that all adjusted for residence, age, and gender. Results for residence, age, gender, LL, and Δ −2LL not shown.
Addition of other covariates did not substantially change the urban coefficient or the Δ −2LL from base.
p < .10
p < .05
p < .01, two-tailed.