Table 4.
Baseline PF Score | se-GL | se-SL | se-IRT | |||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Improved | Same | Worse | Improved | Same | Worse | Improved | Same | Worse | ||||||||||
N | Pct | N | Pct | N | Pct | N | Pct | N | Pct | N | Pct | N | Pct | N | Pct | N | Pct | |
0 | 52 | 80.0 | 13 | 20.0 | 57 | 87.7 | 8 | 12.3 | 53 | 81.5 | 12 | 18.5 | ||||||
5 | 52 | 80.0 | 13 | 20.0 | . | . | 57 | 87.7 | 6 | 9.2 | 2 | 3.1 | 57 | 86.4 | 9 | 13.6 | . | . |
10 | 65 | 77.4 | 19 | 22.6 | . | . | 70 | 83.3 | 7 | 8.3 | 7 | 8.3 | 60 | 76.9 | 14 | 18.0 | 4 | 5.1 |
15 | 68 | 87.2 | 9 | 11.5 | 1 | 1.3 | 70 | 89.7 | 7 | 9.0 | 1 | 1.3 | 63 | 81.8 | 13 | 16.9 | 1 | 1.3 |
20 | 55 | 75.3 | 15 | 20.6 | 3 | 4.1 | 62 | 84.9 | 7 | 9.6 | 4 | 5.5 | 57 | 77.0 | 13 | 17.6 | 4 | 5.4 |
25 | 64 | 82.1 | 14 | 18.0 | . | . | 67 | 85.9 | 10 | 12.8 | 1 | 1.3 | 63 | 80.8 | 15 | 19.2 | . | . |
30 | 54 | 78.3 | 13 | 18.8 | 2 | 2.9 | 56 | 81.2 | 10 | 14.5 | 3 | 4.4 | 48 | 76.2 | 13 | 20.6 | 2 | 3.2 |
35 | 50 | 71.4 | 17 | 24.3 | 3 | 4.3 | 57 | 81.4 | 10 | 14.3 | 3 | 4.3 | 58 | 78.4 | 13 | 17.6 | 3 | 4.1 |
40 | 34 | 57.6 | 20 | 33.9 | 5 | 8.5 | 37 | 62.7 | 16 | 27.1 | 6 | 10.2 | 45 | 65.2 | 21 | 30.4 | 3 | 4.4 |
45 | 29 | 58.0 | 21 | 42.0 | . | . | 33 | 66.0 | 16 | 32.0 | 1 | 2.0 | 31 | 57.4 | 20 | 37.0 | 3 | 5.6 |
50 | 22 | 56.4 | 14 | 35.9 | 3 | 7.7 | 24 | 61.5 | 10 | 25.6 | 5 | 12.8 | 27 | 60.0 | 12 | 26.7 | 6 | 13.3 |
55 | 29 | 48.3 | 27 | 45.0 | 4 | 6.7 | 35 | 58.3 | 18 | 30.0 | 7 | 11.7 | 22 | 53.7 | 16 | 39.0 | 3 | 7.3 |
60 | 28 | 63.6 | 16 | 36.4 | . | . | 31 | 70.5 | 11 | 25.0 | 2 | 4.6 | 31 | 59.6 | 18 | 34.6 | 3 | 5.8 |
65 | 20 | 47.6 | 15 | 35.7 | 7 | 16.7 | 23 | 54.8 | 10 | 23.8 | 9 | 21.4 | 22 | 55.0 | 12 | 30.0 | 6 | 15.0 |
70 | 13 | 43.3 | 16 | 53.3 | 1 | 3.3 | 19 | 63.3 | 8 | 26.7 | 3 | 10.0 | 13 | 54.2 | 7 | 29.2 | 4 | 16.7 |
75 | 5 | 20.0 | 17 | 68.0 | 3 | 12.0 | 14 | 56.0 | 7 | 28.0 | 4 | 16.0 | 12 | 36.4 | 18 | 54.6 | 3 | 9.1 |
80 | 2 | 13.3 | 10 | 66.7 | 3 | 20.0 | 9 | 60.0 | 3 | 20.0 | 3 | 20.0 | 2 | 11.8 | 12 | 70.6 | 3 | 17.7 |
85 | 7 | 36.8 | 9 | 47.4 | 3 | 15.8 | 8 | 42.1 | 6 | 31.6 | 5 | 26.3 | 8 | 50.0 | 6 | 37.5 | 2 | 12.5 |
90 | . | . | 15 | 100.0 | . | . | 8 | 53.3 | 6 | 40.0 | 1 | 6.7 | 5 | 35.7 | 9 | 64.3 | . | . |
95 | . | . | 8 | 80.0 | 2 | 20.0 | 4 | 40.0 | 3 | 30.0 | 3 | 30.0 | 1 | 10.0 | 7 | 70.0 | 2 | 20.0 |
100 | . | . | 5 | 83.3 | 1 | 16.7 | . | . | 5 | 83.3 | 1 | 16.7 | . | . | 5 | 83.3 | 1 | 16.7 |
All | 649 | 65.2 | 306 | 30.7 | 41 | 4.1 | 741 | 74.4 | 184 | 18.5 | 71 | 7.1 | 678 | 68.1 | 265 | 26.6 | 53 | 5.3 |
Shaded cells denote the standard error of measurement approach that resulted in the highest identification of Improved or Worsened PF HRQOL Status from baseline.
Within the table the dark lines indicate the zones where different probability cut points were used to define MCID-based classifications of Improved, Same or Worsened, as specified in Figure 1.