Skip to main content
. 2010 Sep;100(9):1604–1610. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2009.183590

TABLE 4.

Final Model Coefficients, Standard Errors, and Effect Sizes for SBHC-Related Effects for Each Outcome: Middle School and High School Students, Michigan, 2006–2008

Variables Satisfaction With Health Physical Discomfort Emotional Discomfort Physical Activity Healthy Eating Unhealthy Eatinga
b (SE) ES b (SE) ES b (SE) ES b (SE) ES b (SE) ES b (SE) ES
Covariates
Genderb −0.27** (0.03) 0.11** (0.03) 0.14** (0.03) −0.25** (0.06)
SESc
African Americand −0.06* (0.03) −0.23** (0.06) −0.29** (0.06)
Latinod 0.06 (0.04) −0.03 (0.09) −0.14 (0.09)
Otherd −0.10** (0.04) −0.04 (0.09) −0.10 (0.08)
Agec
Middle school or high schoole −0.13** (0.05) 0.07** (0.03) 0.17** (0.03)
Time 1 outcome 0.47** (0.03) 0.51** (0.03) 0.50** (0.03) 0.57** (0.03) 0.42** (0.03) 0.35** (0.03)
Predictors
Implementation SBHCf 0.0006 (0.06) −0.02 (0.03) −0.08* (0.04) –0.13 0.16 (0.12) −0.002 (0.07) −0.07 (0.07)
Established SBHCg −0.02 (0.06) −0.05 (0.03) −0.08* (0.04) –0.14 0.05 (0.12) 0.04 (0.07) 0.04 (0.06)
SBHC userh 0.12** (0.05) 0.21 −0.04 (0.03) −0.08* (0.05) –0.14 0.20** (0.08) 0.20 0.18** (0.07) 0.22 −0.06 (0.07)
User × gender interaction −0.10 (0.09) −0.14** (0.07) –0.22i −0.15 (0.09) −0.04 (0.16) −0.01 (0.14) 0.18 (0.15)
User × SBHC type interaction 0.01 (0.09) 0.06 (0.07) 0.08 (0.09) 0.02 (0.16) 0.14 (0.14) 0.14 (0.15)

Note. SBHC = school-based health center; b = parameter estimate; ES = effect size; SES = socioeconomic status. We computed Hedge g effect sizes following the recommendations by the Institute for Educational Sciences (available at http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/help/idocviewer/Doc.aspx?docId=19&tocId=8#hlm) from the What Works Clearinghouse Procedures and Standards Handbook.21

a

Unhealthy eating is reverse-scored; higher scores reflect less unhealthy eating.

b

Male = 0, female = 1.

c

Not significant and not computed for the full model.

d

Compared with White students (reference group).

e

Middle school = 0, high school = 1.

f

Implementation sites = 1, comparison sites = 0. Comparison sites did not have SBHCs; implementation sites had SBHCs that had been in operation for less than 1 year at time 1.

g

established sites = 1, comparison sites = 0. Comparison sites did not have SBHCs; established sites had SBHCs that had been in operation for at least 6 years at time 1.

h

Nonuser = 0, user = 1. Participants reported lifetime use of the health center.

i

Given the primary interest in user effects, the effect size was computed comparing female users and nonusers.

*P < .10; **P < .05.