Skip to main content
. 2009 Nov 19;61(11-12):773–788. doi: 10.1007/s00251-009-0398-3

Table 1.

Sea bass NITR amino acid sites under positive selection identified using different methods

AA positiona Protein domainb,c Maximum likelihood method
PAMLd FELe RELf MECg
7 Signal P. 0.15
9 Signal P. 0.12
46 V_CDR1 0.993 0.02 804.9
48 V_CDR1 0.04 97.3
51 V 0.984 59.2
55 V 0.04 42.5
56 V 0.10 35.8
69 V_CDR2 27.9
70 V_CDR2 0.10
71 V_CDR2 0.987 0.16 112
72 V_CDR2 0.988
73 V_CDR2 0.997 353.6 5.4
79 V 1.00 0.01 3763.6 5.2
80 V 0.12
93 V 0.19
95 V 0.984 0.01 594
101 V 0.987 32.7
117 V_CDR3 0.17
118 V_CDR3 0.999 0.09 30
119 V_CDR3 0.996 184.2 6
120 V_CDR3 0.978 62.1 4.2
121 V_CDR3 31.7
127 V_CDR3 0.09 21.4
130 V 0.10 23.7

aAmino acid position refers to the sea bass group III alignment reported in Fig. S3 (ESM, Supplementary file 2)

bFor sea bass V-only NITR genes, the analysis was limited to the leader peptide and V-domain because not all the proteins included in this group present a cytoplasmic fragment

cV: V-domain, V_CDR1: complementarity determining region 1, V_CDR2: complementarity determining region 2, V_CDR3: complementarity determining region 3, V/C2: I domain, TM: transmembrane domain, Cyt1 and Cyt2: cytoplasmatic domains

dPosterior probabilities of the BEB analysis

ep value

fBayes factor

gConfidence interval