Skip to main content
. 2010 Jul 29;10:221. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-10-221

Table 2.

Regression results

Change in Barthel score1
n = 398
Change in EQ5D score2
n = 337
Length of care (days)
n = 403
Cost (£s)
n = 403
Age 0.3085
(0.2272)
0.0336
(0.0366)
-0.0490
(0.0890)
0.1273***
(0.0363)
Age squared -0.0022
(0.0014)
-0.0002
(0.0002)
-0.0002
(0.0005)
-0.0008***
(0.0002)
Gender 0.2852
(0.2469)
0.0670
(0.0365)
-0.0225
(0.0754)
0.0352
(0.0379)
Baseline Barthel score -0.2854***
(0.0794)
-0.0136
(0.0111)
0.0039
(0.0083)
Baseline EQ5 D score -0.4363***
(0.0651)
0.1067
(0.1026)
0.0450
(0.1075)
Admission avoidance 0.5030
(0.3478)
0.0044
(0.0400)
-0.2000**
(0.0832)
0.0565
(0.0618)
Residential care 0.6126
(0.6976)
0.0582*
(0.0327)
0.0835
(0.2587)
1.5892***
(0.3578)
Length of care -0.0003
(0.0057)
-0.0003
(0.0005)
- 0.0257***
(0.0030)
Ratio of support to qualified staff 0.2277
(0.4819)
0.0464*
(0.0254)
-0.0564
(0.1042)
0.0600
(0.1076)
Number of different staff types -0.0529
(0.1532)
0.0161
(0.0103)
0.0470
(0.0608)
-0.1827**
(0.0715)
Total number of staff -0.0064
(0.0258)
-0.0005
(0.0011)
0.0010
(0.0104)
0.2026***
(0.0646)
Total number of staff squared -0.0085***
(0.0022)
Constant -4.9479
(8.8322)
1.1658
(1.4717)
6.0765
(3.7505)
0.8401
(1.535)

R-squared 0.1932 0.2505 0.0318 0.2730
Block F-test3 <0.0001 <0.0001 - -
RESET test 0.0002 0.0441 - -

1 Positive changes reflect gains in a patient's level of independence.

2 Positive changes reflect improvements in a patient's health related quality of life.

3 Tests the hypothesis that all parameters are equal to zero.

* 0.10 > p-value > 0.05

** 0.05 > p-value > 0.01

*** p-value <0.01