Skip to main content
. 2010 Aug 9;5:197–208.

Table 3.

(A) The mean (SEM) treatment differences at week 48 for primary and secondary efficacy variables and (B) the difference between post-bronchodilator FEV1 at baseline and post-dose on test day 337

(A) Treatment differences Treatment comparison
Tiotropium Respimat® SMI 5 μg–placebo Tiotropium Respimat® SMI 10 μg–placebo Tiotropium Respimat® SMI 10 μg–5 μg
Primary
Trough (24-h post-dose) FEV1 (L) response (n = 1897) 0.127* (0.013) 0.150* (0.013) 0.023 (0.013)
[95% CI] [0.101, 0.153] [0.124, 0.175] [−0.002, 0.048]
SGRQ total score (n = 1798) −3.5* (0.7) −3.8* (0.7) −0.4 (0.7)
[95% CI] [−4.9, −2.1] [−5.3, −2.4] [−1.7, 1.0]
Mahler TDI focal score (n = 1798) 1.05* (0.17) 1.08* (0.17) 0.02 (0.16)
[95% CI] [0.73, 1.38] [0.75, 1.40] [−0.29, 0.34]
Secondary
Rescue medication use (occasions per day) [n = 1900] −0.6* (0.1) −0.7* (0.1) −0.1 (0.1)
[95% CI] [−0.8, −0.4] [−0.9, −0.5] [−0.3, 0.1]
Morning PEFR (L/min) (n = 1900) 22* (3) 28* (3) 5 (3)
[95% CI] [17, 28] [22, 33] [0, 10]
Evening PEFR (L/min) (n = 1900) 27* (3) 33* (3) 6** (3)
[95% CI] [22, 32] [28, 39] [1, 12]
(B) Treatment comparison Tiotropium Respimat®SMI 5 μg Tiotropium Respimat®SMI 10 μg Placebo
Post-bronchodilator FEV1 at baseline 1.281 1.281 1.282
Post-bronchodilator FEV1 on test day 337 (30 minutes post-dose) 1.242 1.270 1.053
*

P < 0.0001 vs placebo;

**

P < 0.05.

Notes:

Adjusted for smoking status at entry, center and baseline value. A last observation carried forward approach was used for all missing data except rescue medication use and PEFR

These data reflect the overall mean.

Abbreviations: FEV1, forced expiratory volume in 1 second; PEFR, peak expiratory flow rate; SGRQ, St George’s Respiratory Questionnaire; TDI, Transition Dyspnea Index; SMI, Soft Mist™ Inhaler.