Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Aug 16.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Gastroenterol. 2009 Mar 17;104(4):942–952. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2009.55

Table 2.

Provider responses to 749 positive FOBT notifications and associated median times from notification to response (if any) pre and post implementation

Response following a positive FOBT N (%) P Value
Median Pre-QI (n=379) duration in days* Post-QI (n=370)
Appropriate response 216(57.5) 269(73.1) <.0001
18 6 <.0001
Inappropriate response 31(8.2) 6(1.6) <.0001
54 15 0.06
 •Barium Enema ordered 9 (2.4) 4(1.1)
 •Flexible Sigmoidoscopy ordered 0 (0.0) 1(0.3)
 •Provider attributed positive FOBT to other non-colonic causes 12(28.6) 0(0.0)
 •Provider repeated FOBT 8(19.1) 1(5.3)
 •Provider documented that patient was not a candidate for work-up (did not meet exclusion criteria listed in Table 3) 2(4.8) 0(0.0)
Response not needed 66(17.5) 46(12.5) 0.0559
92 6.5 0.0004
 •Documentation by PCP of patient refusal 19 (5.0) 14(3.8)
 •Documentation by PCP of patient having had test at other location 27(7.1) 21(5.7)
 •Documentation of an exclusion criterion 3 (7.1) 0(0.0)
 •Documentation of patient preference to have private physician perform the test 11(26.2) 9(47.4)
 •Documentation of a previous colonoscopy performed elsewhere (within past 10 years) 6(14.3) 2(10.5)
No documented response 66 (17.4%) 49 (13.2%) 0.11
*

represented by shaded rows