Skip to main content
. 2010 Aug 3;7:5. doi: 10.1186/1742-7622-7-5

Table 4.

Multiplication factors for the required sample sizes accounting for clustering at group level

52 visits 20 visits 12 visits 6 visits 4 visits
Model scenario 1 (LS)
no clustering 1.0 1.4 1.9 3.3 4.8
Cluster size n = 5
ICC = 0.04 1.0 1.4 1.8 3.0 4.3
ICC = 0.1 1.0 1.3 1.7 2.7 3.8
ICC = 0.3 1.0 1.2 1.4 2.1 2.8
Cluster size n = 50
ICC = 0.005 1.0 1.3 1.8 2.9 4.2
ICC = 0.02 1.0 1.2 1.5 2.2 3.0
ICC = 0.1 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.4 1.7

Model scenario 2 (LL)
no clustering 1.0 1.1 1.4 2.2 2.9
Cluster size n = 5
ICC = 0.04 1.0 1.1 1.4 2.0 2.7
ICC = 0.1 1.0 1.1 1.3 1.8 2.4
ICC = 0.3 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.5 1.9
Cluster size n = 50
ICC = 0.005 1.0 1.1 1.3 1.9 2.6
ICC = 0.02 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.6 2.0
ICC = 0.1 1.0 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.4

Model scenario 3 (HS)
no clustering 1.0 1.1 1.3 1.7 2.1
Cluster size n = 5
ICC = 0.04 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.6 2.0
ICC = 0.1 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.5 1.8
ICC = 0.3 1.0 1.1 1.1 1.3 1.5
Cluster size n = 50
ICC = 0.005 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.6 1.9
ICC = 0.02 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.4 1.6
ICC = 0.1 1.0 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3

Model scenario 4 (HL)
no clustering 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.5 1.8
Cluster size n = 5
ICC = 0.04 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.4 1.7
ICC = 0.1 1.0 1.0 1.1 1.3 1.6
ICC = 0.3 1.0 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.4
Cluster size n = 50
ICC = 0.005 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.4 1.6
ICC = 0.02 1.0 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.4
ICC = 0.1 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.1 1.2

The sample size is calculated for a study comparing the mean LP between two groups with a 20% LP reduction in one arm (80% power and p = 0.05). Sampling was simulated as 7 day point prevalence recall at each visit (see Table 3.).