Table 4.
Multiplication factors for the required sample sizes accounting for clustering at group level
| 52 visits | 20 visits | 12 visits | 6 visits | 4 visits | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model scenario 1 (LS) | |||||
| no clustering | 1.0 | 1.4 | 1.9 | 3.3 | 4.8 |
| Cluster size n = 5 | |||||
| ICC = 0.04 | 1.0 | 1.4 | 1.8 | 3.0 | 4.3 |
| ICC = 0.1 | 1.0 | 1.3 | 1.7 | 2.7 | 3.8 |
| ICC = 0.3 | 1.0 | 1.2 | 1.4 | 2.1 | 2.8 |
| Cluster size n = 50 | |||||
| ICC = 0.005 | 1.0 | 1.3 | 1.8 | 2.9 | 4.2 |
| ICC = 0.02 | 1.0 | 1.2 | 1.5 | 2.2 | 3.0 |
| ICC = 0.1 | 1.0 | 1.1 | 1.2 | 1.4 | 1.7 |
| Model scenario 2 (LL) | |||||
| no clustering | 1.0 | 1.1 | 1.4 | 2.2 | 2.9 |
| Cluster size n = 5 | |||||
| ICC = 0.04 | 1.0 | 1.1 | 1.4 | 2.0 | 2.7 |
| ICC = 0.1 | 1.0 | 1.1 | 1.3 | 1.8 | 2.4 |
| ICC = 0.3 | 1.0 | 1.1 | 1.2 | 1.5 | 1.9 |
| Cluster size n = 50 | |||||
| ICC = 0.005 | 1.0 | 1.1 | 1.3 | 1.9 | 2.6 |
| ICC = 0.02 | 1.0 | 1.1 | 1.2 | 1.6 | 2.0 |
| ICC = 0.1 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.1 | 1.2 | 1.4 |
| Model scenario 3 (HS) | |||||
| no clustering | 1.0 | 1.1 | 1.3 | 1.7 | 2.1 |
| Cluster size n = 5 | |||||
| ICC = 0.04 | 1.0 | 1.1 | 1.2 | 1.6 | 2.0 |
| ICC = 0.1 | 1.0 | 1.1 | 1.2 | 1.5 | 1.8 |
| ICC = 0.3 | 1.0 | 1.1 | 1.1 | 1.3 | 1.5 |
| Cluster size n = 50 | |||||
| ICC = 0.005 | 1.0 | 1.1 | 1.2 | 1.6 | 1.9 |
| ICC = 0.02 | 1.0 | 1.1 | 1.2 | 1.4 | 1.6 |
| ICC = 0.1 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.1 | 1.2 | 1.3 |
| Model scenario 4 (HL) | |||||
| no clustering | 1.0 | 1.1 | 1.2 | 1.5 | 1.8 |
| Cluster size n = 5 | |||||
| ICC = 0.04 | 1.0 | 1.1 | 1.2 | 1.4 | 1.7 |
| ICC = 0.1 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.1 | 1.3 | 1.6 |
| ICC = 0.3 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.1 | 1.2 | 1.4 |
| Cluster size n = 50 | |||||
| ICC = 0.005 | 1.0 | 1.1 | 1.2 | 1.4 | 1.6 |
| ICC = 0.02 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.1 | 1.2 | 1.4 |
| ICC = 0.1 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.1 | 1.2 |
The sample size is calculated for a study comparing the mean LP between two groups with a 20% LP reduction in one arm (80% power and p = 0.05). Sampling was simulated as 7 day point prevalence recall at each visit (see Table 3.).