Skip to main content
. 2010 Aug 16;5(8):e12197. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0012197

Table 1. Summary of clinical data and distribution according to the DNA methylation profile.

Cluster
Group I Group II
Gender
Male 63 31 32
Female 53 27 26
Age
<60 yr 31 15 16
>60yr 85 43 42
FAB Sub-type p* = 0.011
M0 4 3(75%) 1(25%)
M1 19 13(68%) 6(32%)
M2 30 16(53%) 14(47%)
M3 9 0(0%) 9(100%)
M4 13 8(61%) 5(39%)
M4EO 11 5(45%) 6(55%)
M5 27 10(37%) 17(63%)
M6 3 3(100%) 0(0%)
TOTAL 116 58(50%) 58(50%)
Cytogenetic Prognosis Group ** p*<0.001
Favorable 30 6(20%) 24(80%)
t(8;21) 10 1(10%) 9(90%)
inv(16) 11 5(45%) 6(55%)
t(15;17) 9 0(0%) 9(100%)
Intermediate 61 32(52%) 29(48%)
Normal Karyotype 41 23(56%) 18(44%)
Single Trisomy 12 5(42%) 7(68%)
Double Trisomy 3 2(67%) 1(33%)
Other Intermediate 5 2(40%) 3(60%)
Adverse 25 20(80%) 5(20%)
Complex Karyotype 14 14(100%) 0(0%)
MLL 7 2(29%) 5(71%)
Other Adverse 4 4(100%) 0(0%)
FLT3 p* = 0.537
ITD 15 9(60%) 6(40%)
Mutation 6 2(33%) 4(67%)
ITD+Mutation 1 1(100%) 0(0%)
Negative 61 35(57%) 26(43%)
ND 33 11(33%) 22(67%)

*p value from Fisher-Freeman-Halton exact test.

**Samples were analyzed cytogenetically according to standard methods and were sub-classified into three sub-groups according to the CALGB cytogenetics cumulative incidence of relapse classification system [39]. The Fisher-Freeman-Halton exact test was calculated for the three major groups (favorable, intermediate, and adverse).