Table 1.
Cat # | Distal graft apposition |
Electrophysiology | FE | TB | c-Fos | NF | Nissl Stain |
Axon count |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Good | − | + | + | − | + | + | − |
2 | Good | − | + | + | − | + | + | − |
3 | Good | + | − | − | − | + | + | + |
4 | Good | + | − | − | − | + | + | + |
5 | Good | − | + | − | − | + | + | − |
6 | NA | |||||||
7 | Good | + | − | − | − | − | − | − |
8 | Good | + | − | − | − | + | − | − |
9 | Poor | |||||||
10 | NA | |||||||
11 | Good | + | − | − | + | + | + | + |
12 | Good | + | − | − | + | + | + | + |
Overview of the outcome measures performed on the 12 cats involved in this study. First column, the apposition of the distal end of the PNG was successful in 9/10 cats. Cat #6 and #10 had a necrotic PNG due to poor rostral apposition, so the distal end of the PNG was not apposed. The distal end of the PNG was poorly apposed for cat #9. Therefore no further testing was performed on these 3 animals. +, indicates that the experiment/staining procedure was performed; −, indicates no data collection. FE, Fluoro-emerald; TB, True blue; NF, neurofilament immunocytochemistry.