Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: Hepatology. 2010 Jun;51(6):1961–1971. doi: 10.1002/hep.23535

Table 4.

Association between fructose consumption and liver histology of NAFLD in different age groups

Younger group (< 48 years old) Older group (> = 48 years old)

Adjusted (Model 1) Adjusted (Model 2) Adjusted (Model 1) Adjusted (Model 2)

OR [95% CI] p-value OR [95% CI] p-value OR [95% CI] p-value OR [95% CI] p-value

Steatosis
Fructose consumption
 < 7 servings - - - - - - - -
 > = 7 servings 1.1 [0.6, 2.0] 0.72 1.0 [0.6, 1.9] 0.95 0.3 [0.1, 0.6] 0.0009 0.2 [0.1, 0.5] 0.0008
Lobular inflammation
Fructose consumption
 < 7 servings - - - - - - - -
 > = 7 servings 0.7 [0.4, 1.3] 0.24 0.9 [0.5, 1.8] 0.83 2.1 [1.0, 4.8] 0.07 2.5 [1.0, 6.2] 0.05
Ballooning
Fructose consumption
 < 7 servings - - - - - - - -
 > = 7 servings 1.3 [0.7, 2.3] 0.40 1.5 [0.8, 2.8] 0.19 2.1 [0.9, 4.5] 0.07 2.5 [1.0, 6.0] 0.05
Fibrosis
Fructose consumption
 < 7 servings - - - - - - - -
 > = 7 servings 2.5 [1.4, 4.4] 0.003 3.2 [1.7, 6.1] 0.0003 2.1 [0.1, 4.3] 0.05 3.2 [1.4, 7.4] 0.006

Fructose consumption is expresses as reported servings per week. OR (cumulative odds ratio) and p-values were derived from ordinal logistic regression models (Model 1: adjusted for age, gender, BMI, Hispanic ethnicity, and total calorie intake; Model 2: adjusted for age, gender, BMI, Hispanic ethnicity, total calorie intake, triglycerides, HDL-cholesterol, LDL-cholesterol, uric acid, and HOMA-IR.