Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Periodontol. 2009 Nov;80(11):1731–1741. doi: 10.1902/jop.2009.090236

Table 2.

Table 2a. Change from Baseline in Serum Biomarkers, by Treatment Group, for Markers with High Frequency of Detection
Treatment Group (N = 302) Control Group (N = 318) P value, unadjusted analysis P value, adjusted analysis
CRP −0.06 (0.39)* −0.08 (0.36) 0.60 0.65§
PGE2 0.08 (0.56) 0.06 (0.54) 0.71 0.34
MMP-9 −0.02 (0.26) −0.02 (0.31) 0.97 0.93
Fibrinogen 0.30 (0.29) 0.27 (0.32) 0.35 0.35
Endotoxin 0.05 (1.54) 0.02 (1.54) 0.76 0.67
Table 2b. Reduction of Detectable Serum Biomarkers, by Treatment Group, for Markers with Low Frequency of Detection
Treatment Group (N = 302) Control Group(N = 318) P value
IL-1β 10/16 (62.5%) 13/23 (56.5) 0.75**
IL-6 12/20 (60.0) 16/23 (69.6) 0.54
IL-8 8/9 (88.9) 4/5 (80.0) 1.00
TNF-α 15/23 (65.2) 14/25 (56.0) 0.57
*

Mean change (standard deviation), in the same units as Table 1; Positive value indicates an increase from baseline, negative values a decrease.

Significantly different from baseline, P < 0.05

§

Comparing groups; from adjusted analysis including clinical site (MN, KY, MS, NY), clinic by group interaction, age, BMI and race/ethnicity (Total N = 586, see Fig. 1).

Proportion (%) of women with baseline and follow-up biomarker data who had readings above the lower limit of detection at baseline and below the lower limit at 29–32 weeks.

**

Comparing Groups; unadjusted comparison using Fisher’s exact test