Skip to main content
. 2009 Aug 23;65(3):196–200. doi: 10.1136/thx.2008.111492

Table 2.

Wet weight of sputum expectorated: HFCWO compared with usual ACT

Period of sputum collection Expectorated sputum wet weight (g)
Usual ACT HFCWO Mean difference p Value
Mean (SD) Median (IQR) Mean (SD) Median (IQR)
Single treatment session 9.1 (7.9) 7.2 (3.0–14.2) 4.6 (4.1) 3.4 (1.5–6.7) 4.4 (3.5 to 5.4) <0.001
24 h (excluding treatment)* 22.4 (26.8) 12.9 (4.0–29.9) 24.9 (25.8) 15.3 (3.9–40.1) −1.5 (−4.6 to 1.6) 0.352
24 h (including treatment) 39.8 (36.3) 25.5 (14.0–57.1) 34.3 (30.7) 26.3 (12.1–46.0) 6.9 (3.1 to 10.8) <0.001

Data are presented as mean (SD) or (95% CI) or median (IQR) as appropriate. Data are adjusted for randomisation, day, time and position of treatment using a mixed effects linear regression model.

*

Of 116 24-h sputum samples collected, two were discarded as they were incomplete.

ACT, airway clearance technique; HFCWO, high frequency chest wall oscillation.