Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Aug 17.
Published in final edited form as: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2007 Aug;33(4):816–828. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.33.4.816

Table 1.

A brief description of the nine new experiments investigating the effect of contextual cueing on slope and RT in Figure 4

Experiment N SS Stimuli Background
Lattice
Main effect of
Configuration
(Slope)
Main effect of
Configuration
(RT)
2 12 8, 12 Letters Yes No Marginal
3 8 8, 12 T vs L No No Yes
4 12 4, 8, 12 T vs L Yes No Yes
5 12 8, 12 V vs H Yes No Yes
6 12 8, 12 V vs H Yes No Yes
7 12 8, 12 T vs L* Yes Marginal Yes
8 12 8, 12 V vs H Yes No Yes
9 13 8, 12 T vs L Yes No Yes
10 13 8, 12 V vs H Yes Yes Yes

Where N = Number of participants and SS = Set Sizes

Stimuli Description:

Letters = Stimuli were heterogeneous letters. The task was to respond to the mirror reversed letter

T vs L = The task was to respond to the orientation of the letter T among rotated distractor Ls (n.b., this was the same task as that of Experiment 1)

T vs L* = The task was to respond to the color of the T among Ls. All stimuli were randomly colored red or green

V vs H = The task was to report whether the target was a vertical or horizontal line. The distractors were oblique lines orientated either 30, 60, −30 or −60 degrees of the vertical