Table 1.
A brief description of the nine new experiments investigating the effect of contextual cueing on slope and RT in Figure 4
Experiment | N | SS | Stimuli | Background Lattice |
Main effect of Configuration (Slope) |
Main effect of Configuration (RT) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2 | 12 | 8, 12 | Letters | Yes | No | Marginal |
3 | 8 | 8, 12 | T vs L | No | No | Yes |
4 | 12 | 4, 8, 12 | T vs L | Yes | No | Yes |
5 | 12 | 8, 12 | V vs H | Yes | No | Yes |
6 | 12 | 8, 12 | V vs H | Yes | No | Yes |
7 | 12 | 8, 12 | T vs L* | Yes | Marginal | Yes |
8 | 12 | 8, 12 | V vs H | Yes | No | Yes |
9 | 13 | 8, 12 | T vs L | Yes | No | Yes |
10 | 13 | 8, 12 | V vs H | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Where N = Number of participants and SS = Set Sizes
Stimuli Description:
Letters = Stimuli were heterogeneous letters. The task was to respond to the mirror reversed letter
T vs L = The task was to respond to the orientation of the letter T among rotated distractor Ls (n.b., this was the same task as that of Experiment 1)
T vs L* = The task was to respond to the color of the T among Ls. All stimuli were randomly colored red or green
V vs H = The task was to report whether the target was a vertical or horizontal line. The distractors were oblique lines orientated either 30, 60, −30 or −60 degrees of the vertical