TABLE 3.
Electrophile | ELUMO (eV) | EHOMO (eV) | η | ω |
n-Hexane | 2.52 | − 8.28 | 5.40 | 0.77 |
HD | − 0.44 | − 6.70 | 3.13 | 2.04 |
Acrylamide | − 0.86 | − 6.77 | 2.95 | 2.46 |
Acrolein | − 1.70 | − 6.98 | 2.64 | 3.57 |
Note. LUMO, lowest unoccupied molecular orbital; HOMO, highest occupied molecular orbital. The LUMO energies (ELUMO) and the HOMO energies (EHOMO) were calculated using Spartan04 (version 1.0.3) software (Wavefunction, Inc., Irvine, CA). Global (whole molecule) hardness (η) was calculated as η = (ELUMO − EHOMO)/2 and the electrophilicity index (ω) was calculated as ω = μ2/2η, where μ is chemical potential of the electrophile and was calculated as μ = (ELUMO + EHOMO)/2 (for details, see LoPachin et al., 2008). The ω parameter is a measure of the electrophilic reactivity of a given chemical. Data indicate that HD and parent hexacarbon are harder (higher η value) electrophiles than the α,β-unsaturated carbonyls, acrylamide, and acrolein. However, HD is a significantly weaker electrophile (lower ω value) than acrylamide or acrolein.