Skip to main content
. 2010 Sep;24(9):3298–3309. doi: 10.1096/fj.09-147488

TABLE 2.

DEAB treatment in zebrafish, medaka, and Mexican tetra at different time points

Species DEAB treatment Tooth induction
D. rerio 5–11 hpf (5 μm)
D. rerio 12–24 hpf (10 μm) +
D. rerio 18–30 hpf (10 μm)
D. rerio 23–30 hpf (10 μm)
D. rerio 20–28 hpf (10 μm)
D. rerio 28–32 hpf (10 μm) +
D. rerio 40–56 hpf (10 μm)
O. latipes Stage 20–stage 32 (30 μm)
O. latipes 4–8 dpf (30 μm) +
O. latipes 3–7 dpf (60 μm) +
O. latipes 5–8 dpf (60 μm) +
O. latipes 4–7 dpf (100 μm) +
O. latipes 4–8 dpf (120 μm) +
O. latipes 4–8 dpf (160 μm) +
A. mexicanus 18–75 hpf (20 μm)
A. mexicanus 24–75 hpf (20 μm)
A. mexicanus 27–75 hpf (50 μm) +/−
A. mexicanus 30–75 hpf (50 μm) +
A. mexicanus 30–75 hpf (75 μm) +
A. mexicanus 40–75 hpf (50 μm) +

The presence of teeth was monitored by in situ hybridization with dlx2a and or dlx2b for the zebrafish and the Mexican tetra and by Alizarin red staining and dlx3b for the medaka.