Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Comput Model Eng Sci. 2010;57(1):51–76.

Table 2.

Growth function with neighboring points and stress terms provided much better agreement with the target T3 geometry.

Growth Function GF1 GF2 GF3 GF4
Average T3 WT (cm) 0.15857 0.15857 0.15857 0.15857
Absolute Error (cm) 0.01833 0.01014 0.01307 0.00706
Relative Error 11.56% 6.39% 8.24% 4.45%